Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Saif Ali Khan filmography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:03:47 4 August 2019 (UTC) [1].
Saif Ali Khan filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A well written and well sourced list of Saif Ali Khan's film career. Another nomination of mine has received three supports, so I think I am good to go. As always, looking forward to some constructive and helpful comments. Thanks! Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Aoba47
[edit]- I would be more specific in the infobox image caption by saying where the picture was taken. See something like a List of Emily Blunt performances as an example of this.
- I would add ALT text to the infobox image.
- I think a verb is needed for this part (and then in Aashik Awara (1993).). Maybe something like (and then starred in Aashik Awara (1993).)?
- For this part (Khan played the supporting roles ), "the" is not needed.
- I would add a citation for Sacred Games as everything else in the lead is cited.
- Since there is an entire section (i.e. Non-Fiction) about how he has hosted multiple Filmfare Awards ceremonies, I would add a short sentence to the lead about it as the lead should reflect a part of every section of the list.
Great work with the list. I have only looked over the prose, and I have not looked through any of the sources. Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to support this for promotion. Have a great rest of your day! Aoba47 (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Aoba47 Thanks for your queries. They have been resolved. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for addressing everything. I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 18:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from ChrisTheDude
[edit]- In the photo caption, "inaugural" is not a noun and really isn't the right word to use here. "Opening" would be more appropriate
- "as did his other three releases" => "as did his next three releases"
- "leading a setback" => "leading to a setback"
- "It also marked a turning point in his career" - how?
- As per the sources, DCH brought a dramatic change in Khan's approach to work and established him as a serious actor. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you need to say that then. Just saying "it was a turning point in his career" doesn't really tell the reader much.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Refs on the first sentence of paragraph 3 are not in numeric order
- Same again two sentences later
- And again on the first sentence of the last paragraph
- Cocktail wikilink is wrong
- In the TV fiction table, the year is the first column, whereas in the other tables it isn't - be consistent
- Non-fiction should not have a capital F
- Note a needs a full stop
- Hope this helps -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- ChrisTheDude Thanks for the comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from zmbro
- Made this edit for consistency
- Aashik Awara is spelled with a k in the lead but a q in the table (and table one is a redirect)
- Ref dates for Sacred Games aren't consistent with the rest
Everything looks good. Great job on this! – zmbro (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Zmbro All done. Thanks for the comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:10, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – All good for me. :-) – zmbro (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review –
I found one formatting issue: the publisher of ref 59 (The New York Times) should be italicized since that is a print publication.The reliability of the references looks fine, and the sources are well-formatted other than that one item that should be easy to fix.The link-checker tool indicates that ref 61 isn't loading for it, so it's worth a quick check to see if the archive version should be the one highlighted. So, just a couple of quick fixes/checks and this will be a pass.Giants2008 (Talk) 22:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Giants2008 Fixed both the issues. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:08, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The fixes look good, so I'd say this source review is a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:08, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.