Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Tom Mix filmography/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Tom Mix filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Tom Mix filmography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Tom Mix filmography/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Jimknut (talk) 17:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am re-nominating this for featured list because Tom Mix was a major and influential star of the early days of American cinema. He warrants having an outstanding filmography. I strongly believe that what is offered here is of FL status. Please take a look and tell me what you think. Jimknut (talk) 17:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments by BeatlesLedTV
Other than that it's very well written and well referenced. Good job. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support – My comments have been resolved. I fully support the promotion to featured status. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. Jimknut (talk) 23:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Source Review
- Jimknut I know I've already given my support on the list but I've decided to take care of the source review as well. Just know my support still stands.
- Link Hollywood Walk of Fame in ref 11
- What do you mean by this? The link goes to the Hollywood Walk of Fame's web page on Mix.
- I mean link to the Hollywood Walk of Fame's page here on Wikipedia. It's honestly no big deal if it isn't.
- Using the toolbox:
- I found ref 155 has a download error and is marked dead.
- I checked the link. It works fine for me.
- There are MANY green links; every one except for one or two is from the Library of Congress. Also, almost all of them are marked "changes sub-domain" so I would consider archiving them. Here is the full list.
- I fixed these.
- Everything else looks good. Hope this helps it become featured! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 04:32, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the insight. Jimknut (talk) 16:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep everything's fixed. Source review passed. Great job and happy editing! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 22:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 10:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for input. I hope the changes made are acceptable. Jimknut (talk) 21:54, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 21:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – My issues have been addressed and I think this meets the criteria. Nice work on the list. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Courcelles (talk) 19:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Not sure what you mean by "and often photographed to show him doing his own stunt work." Shot at such an angle to be clearly doing his own stunts, or literally photographed?
|
- Support Courcelles (talk) 19:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 18:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.