Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Border map no. 21

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2022 at 16:56:35 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last year, where it was featured unanimously. Very high resolution map.
Articles in which this image appears: Lapp Codicil of 1751
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
Creator: Unknown

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Too big at 41Kx16K pixels, thus Oppose unless file resized to manageable size (e.g. earlier upload 2021-12-04 12:36:54), now it breaks Firefox, breaks ZoomViewer. There's no need for a map with this little detail to be such a large file. --Janke | Talk 21:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the size of the tiny text justifies it, but a courtesy copy would be nice. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 16:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Target is a 217-word stub. – Sca (talk) 12:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't see the EV relative to the article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I kind of have to agree. It's only a tiny bit of the map, in the end, and there's not really much text saying why this is an important part of the border (if it is). I could see it as part of a gallery/set, but it's hard to understand why specifically this one. I also fully get why it passed Commons, where the usage wouldn't be judged so much. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 15:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment has this been upscaled at some point? At full resolution it looks blocky.©Geni (talk) 10:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]