Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Long Billed Corella Beak.jpg

Reason: Great quality. Already successfully nominated a picture of the whole bird, however this one serves a different purpose, demonstrating beak structure. This image also provides greater detail for the most important part of the bird for identification purposes.
Articles this image appears in: Beak, Long-billed Corella
Creator: Noodle snacks

Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support It's a great pic, but is it my eyes (from the white), or are the feathers south-west of his eye VERY blurry? Dengero (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment existing FP of exactly the same subject, by same creator. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Absolute Oppose This picture is already an fp. Rj1020 (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose existing FP covers the apparent subject/focus of this image adequately already. Mfield (talk) 04:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - a crop of a FP is not a new FP. pschemp | talk 13:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think it's a crop, but still. Fletcher (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose since its a crop of another FP. TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME 16:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The other FP already does a very good job of illustrating this. Clegs (talk) 20:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. FWIW and in the interests of fairness, this is neither an existing FP nor a crop of the existing FP, even if it is clearly taken at the same time and is almost certainly the same bird. --jjron (talk) 09:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 12:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]