Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Nic Stone
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2019 at 13:00:58 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Nic_Stone_at_BookCon_%2826573%29_%28cropped%29.jpg/350px-Nic_Stone_at_BookCon_%2826573%29_%28cropped%29.jpg)
- Reason
- A really nice image of a notable recently-launched author. One of the best from Rhododendrites's BookExpo photography of the last couple days. I was worried because of a couple distracting elements in the original photo, but they cropped right out with a really nice photo left behind.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Nic Stone
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
- Creator
- Rhododendrites
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 13:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support - --LLcentury (talk) 18:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Geoffroi (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - Distracting text in the background DannyS712 (talk) 00:25, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- One could relatively readily edit the top one out, but I worry that would be misleading. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.6% of all FPs 03:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Thanks for the nom, Adam. Still going through all the photos from this event! :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 01:54, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – sorry but I think there is a better picture of her in the article: This one, it doesn't meet the 1500px requirement but IMO is a better depiction of her. Somehow her expression in the nom image is a bit unusual (or perhaps uninteresting). I know it's a subjective thing but that's just my opinion. Bammesk (talk) 02:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- oppose as above - distracting text in the background. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:00, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. MER-C 10:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. Despite the distracting background in the image linked above by Bammesk, I think the author's expression in it is much better. She just looks bored here. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Vulphere 12:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 14:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)