Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Perimeter

Perimeter

I nominate this image because it is particularly striking and draws attention immediately, as well as because it illustrates the reality of Perimeter in a way words cannot possibly. Picture was taken by Tim Horton.

Nominate and support. - Tim Horton 03:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The blown highlights in the sky and elsewhere are the main problems, along with the picture being fairly blurry/grainy. The angle is good, but the technical aspects of the picture ruin it as a FP. --Tewy 03:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Tim, I think that the other image in the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics article is more qualified for FPC than this image. If you would like to nominate a picture of this building, I would suggest the version that was taken from the front and has a better saturation of colors, has less grain, etc.. --Tewy 03:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeBlurred - Adrian Pingstone 07:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per poor technical quality. HighInBC 16:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Blurry and grainy. Angle is OK, position is not. 207.87.51.122 01:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - poorly focused. --Ineffable3000 02:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Boring. That pretty much sums it up. --Midnight Rider 04:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I actually agree with Tewy, the other image in the article is much nicer (though I think the trees may keep it from passing FPC). Staxringold _talk^contribs 15:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]