Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Schilthorn

Schilthorn

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 May 2013 at 15:08:27 (UTC)

Reason: High EV and quality
Articles in which this image appears: Schilthorn
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Ximonic

Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great shot, the people show scale and don't bother me, but I'm not a fan of the photograph itself for some reason—too contrasty or too soft, not sure if it's a result of high-altitude photography. I'll think on it further. Addendum; oh, it could be that the building is almost eyeline with the mountains, which is poor composition. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 18:02, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose I think this image portrays the top of the mountain rather well, but there is not a whole lot of EV in terms of representing the whole mountain. Perhaps if the picture was in a section about the top of the mountain? --Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 01:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support a bit contrasty but that may be inevitable with high-altitude photography. I agree that the EV isn't ideal in its current placement which is my main reason for giving it weak rather than full support. I suggest that you consider nominating this at Commons FPC. --Pine^✉ 06:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The EV seems okay to me. After all, the top of a mountain is the most important part to show, and there is actually something built on top of this mountain to see. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral EV is okay, but as pointed out by Keraunoscopia the building's level and the peaks should not be at the same level. TechFilmer - Feel free to drop a message. 17:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]