Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Veszprém church
this is my first nomination here and I hope I don't mess up things. I really like this picture. :)
- Nominate and support. - Alensha 21:59, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- Neutral. Good picture but I wish the bottom weren't cropped - it seems to be cutting something off. Rhobite 22:41, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support, I like it. Halibutt 11:05, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. I don't like the old style building illuminated with harsh electric lights. Also the bottom seems cut off. Enochlau 08:01, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. I like the photo but as far as a featured picture goes, its just a bit too obscure and doesn't really demonstrate the architecture or its setting very well. It looks like the sort of building best photographed from further away (if possible) and during the day. Diliff 12:21, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. What is this picture about? The object in the foreground, or the church? Also, the artificial lighting doesn't really add anything. I would probably support this if it was taken from an other angle and during day-time. Mstroeck 12:57, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. This does not add significantly to the Veszprém article. It is not even on the page! --Dschwen 13:29, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- It's not on the page because the article is still too short and there's no place for further images. Alensha 14:20, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- That's no excuse. Featured pictures need an article. If it's not in the article, exchange one of the current pictures for it, or submit this to the commons and vote on it there. Enochlau 20:50, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- done & thanks for pointing this out, I'm still a newbie to this :) Alensha 00:03, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- There's an easy way to add a pic to an article that has no room. Just start a gallery at the bottom of the article. Get the gallery code from the Hot air balloon article - Adrian Pingstone 21:56, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
- done & thanks for pointing this out, I'm still a newbie to this :) Alensha 00:03, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- That's no excuse. Featured pictures need an article. If it's not in the article, exchange one of the current pictures for it, or submit this to the commons and vote on it there. Enochlau 20:50, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- It's not on the page because the article is still too short and there's no place for further images. Alensha 14:20, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. However, the light in nthe middle-left is a little distracting. Could something be done about that? - JDH Owens talk | Esperanza 11:08, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:39, 6 November 2005 (UTC)