Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Naruto volumes/archive1
Naruto volumes[edit]
- Contributor(s): Sephiroth BCR, 1989
This former featured topic has had significant changes made to all of the lists since it was demoted back at the end of 2013. Since the conclusion of Part II, all of the lists pertaining to the manga have been promoted to featured status, thus passing WP:FT?. I am personally a big fan of Naruto, so I hope to see this topic get promoted again. --KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 23:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: The three subordinate articles seem to contain literally exactly the same content as the main list, just divided into three parts. It seems as though we either don't need the overview list or don't need the three shorter ones. I'm not sure this seems like a "topic" so much as two copies of the exact same material. What am I missing? -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 23:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- The separate lists are transcluded in the Volumes article. I wonder if there’s some way for it to look like this again, while keeping it transcluded. Pinging Tintor2. 1989 (talk) 17:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- I tend to suck at making sublists. Normally, DragonZero used to help me when I messed up the sublist of D.Gray-man and Bungo Stray Dogs.Tintor2 (talk) 17:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support @Bryanrutherford0 and Tintor2: The sublist transclusion has been fixed by DragonZero. 1989 (talk) 15:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this is something we're supposed to consider at WP:FTC, but it doesn't look to me like the overview list would pass WP:FLC as it now exists; it has a section that consists entirely of a hatnote and no text. I won't oppose this nomination over it, but this one doesn't make sense to me. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 19:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Section removed. 1989 (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, and now the article seems to me to be incomplete (and thus not feature quality) because it doesn't cover those film comic tankōbon (despite mentioning them in the lead). Doesn't seem ready to me. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 19:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Section removed. 1989 (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this is something we're supposed to consider at WP:FTC, but it doesn't look to me like the overview list would pass WP:FLC as it now exists; it has a section that consists entirely of a hatnote and no text. I won't oppose this nomination over it, but this one doesn't make sense to me. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 19:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Everything checks out. Armbrust The Homunculus 18:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support This hits all the marks, lots of work, kudos. MPJ-DK (talk) 21:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Closed with consensus to promote to Featured Topic - GamerPro64 03:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)