Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Pearl Jam studio albums/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pearl Jam studio albums[edit]

Contributor(s): igordebraga 03:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC), User:-5-, User:WesleyDodds, User:Koavf[reply]

"Any generation that would pick Kurt or me as its spokesman -- that must be a pretty fucked up generation, don't you think?" - Eddie Vedder. Anyway, given Kurt's band gave the precedent for this topic, let's just say it is a topic with a clear scope: Pearl Jam's nine studio albums, all GAs, and the FT discography as the main article. --igordebraga 03:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose based simply on the issues with the lead item, the FL. It has a maintenance tag (link rot) and is a good example of an old-fashioned featured list. It needs updating to meet current standards. At a quick glance, there are some completely unreferenced releases (e.g. Live at the Showbox, "Chloe Dancer"), some completely unreferenced charts (e.g. CAN and CAN Alt in the "Other charted songs" section), a completely unreferenced section (the "Other appearances" section), some link issues, and I believe none of the tables meet MOS:DTT, a requirement of featured lists. It would be a shame to go to the trouble of promoting this to a featured topic when the lead article needs so much work to remain featured. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I fixed the links and added references where I could, anything else? (also, give more input on DTT, even if on my talk page). igordebraga 14:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nothing more to deal with quickly here. Thanks for your good work in updating the article to current standards and not simply ignoring part of a topic candidate that was way below standard. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Topic meets the criteria. Rreagan007 (talk) 23:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Seems kosher to me, now FL has been refined. GRAPPLE X 17:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. A lot of hard work has been put into these articles, and definitely meets the criteria. Basilisk4u (talk) 18:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closed with consensus to promote. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 19:52, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]