Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 April 5
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 April 5)
April 5
[edit]
- - uploaded by GordonCollege (notify | contribs).
- CV, uploader claims Public Domain but edit summary confirms image on Gordon College website demonstrating copyright status. — — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 00:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by GordonCollege (notify | contribs).
- CV, uploader claims Public Domain but edit summary confirms image on Gordon College website demonstrating copyright status. — — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 00:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by GordonCollege (notify | contribs).
- CV, uploader claims Public Domain but edit summary confirms image on Gordon College website demonstrating copyright status. — — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 00:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by GordonCollege (notify | contribs).
- CV, uploader claims Public Domain but edit summary confirms image on Gordon College website demonstrating copyright status. — — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 00:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by GordonCollege (notify | contribs).
- CV, uploader claims Public Domain but edit summary confirms image on Gordon College website demonstrating copyright status. — — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 00:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Masterg271 (notify | contribs).
- Unencylopedic, Orphan, Ethnically offensive — The Myotis 01:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC).
- Speedy deleted as an attack page WP:CSD#G10.--Húsönd 02:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic and a bad award image, since it's a group of penises in the shape of a barnstar. Also a possible attack use/vandalism target image. — AAA! (AAAA) 01:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC).
- Strong delete per the nominator. Acalamari 16:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep Penises have historically been used to describe the act of creation, such as with the ancient swastika - there's no reason then that penises can't be a good award. Furthermore, we don't censor things based on puritanical values - see WP:NOT#CENSORED Notdsk 02:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete While that may well be, you have personally used it for attack purposes. I'd like to assume good faith on your part, but the cynic in me suspects that you'll use the image for this purpose again. Your attack may have been targeted at an anonymous vandal, but that's no excuse. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pekaje (talk • contribs) 06:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Maveric149 (notify | contribs).
- No source, and no evidence this image was released as promotional. Without information on when/where/why was this image released, we can't claim our use won't affect the copyright holder. Abu badali (talk) 02:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. A low res screencapture from the show would be better anyway. mav 12:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per the nominator. Acalamari 16:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by James.beckwith (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, used in an article deleted in AFD Coredesat 04:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per the nominator. Also, I can't think of a place where it can be used. Acalamari 16:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- No citation for image location (license abuse), and the image has not been used anywhere. — Seicer (talk) (contribs) 05:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- No citation for image location (license abuse); the image was derived from Amazon.com; the image has not been used anywhere. — Seicer (talk) (contribs) 05:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, possibly Copyright violation (tagged as wrong license, source link dead). Fritz S. (Talk) 11:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, possibly Copyright violation. Fritz S. (Talk) 11:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic, only used on advert for non-notable organisation, absent uploader, orphaned.- Resurgent insurgent 12:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Nectarflowed (notify | contribs).
- UE, this [1] discussion from Race and intelligence, indicates that information presented isnt entirely from the source and that isnt accurately displayed. The image has been used by DavidYork71 (talk · contribs) (currently blocked for disruptive editing) on his talk page without context. — Gnangarra 13:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Gnangarra. --Aminz 03:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, this graph is important in illustrating the beliefs of those who think there is a correlation between race and IQ. Obviously, it should not be presented uncritically, but should instead be attributed as the belief of a certain subgroup of people. Per the Muhammad cartoons controversy precedent, we don't delete images because people find them offensive. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 13:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- comment Its about the inaccurate representation of sourced information combined with unsourced information. The inclusion of the disruptive activities is only secondary, we do delete images uploaded with the intention of solely vandalistic edits. Since it was uploaded(now orphaned) I assume in good faith is the only reason its here instead of being speedy deleted. Gnangarra 13:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, this image isn't being used in any articles, and there's no active discussion about this image on any talk pages except in regard to this deletion debate. As such, I'll go ahead and delete this image. If there's anyone that is genuinely interested in bringing the image back into the original article or into a new discussion, I will be happy to restore it. — Rebelguys2 talk 07:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- CV. Tagged as cc-by-2.5, but source URL indicates the image is © All rights reserved. --Muchness 14:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- CV. Tagged as cc-by-2.5, but source URL indicates the image is © All rights reserved. --Muchness 14:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- CV. Tagged as cc-by-2.5, but source URL indicates the image is © All rights reserved. --Muchness 14:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Possible CV, OR, UE — -- Whereizben - Chat with me - My Contributions 15:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- UE, OR — -- Whereizben - Chat with me - My Contributions 15:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- UE, OR — -- Whereizben - Chat with me - My Contributions 15:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- The image looks fine in terms of licensing and being used in an article. Kept. — Rebelguys2 talk 07:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, possibly Copyright violation according to talk. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Drpepper000 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, possibly Copyright violation. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic. RJASE1 Talk 15:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, possibly Copyright violation (see talk). Fritz S. (Talk) 15:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, very likely Copyright violation. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Thai history 0102 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, tagged as possibly wrong license. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic, uploader absent since upload Iamunknown 15:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, low quality, I'm unsure what the flag is so (currently) of little encylcopedic value Iamunknown 15:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Appears to be superceded by Image:Flag of Scotland.svg. — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 16:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! The flag looked familiar but I wasn't which country flag it was. --Iamunknown 17:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Appears to be superceded by Image:Flag of Scotland.svg. — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 16:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- The original image uploaded in 2005-12-12 has been replaced by three other images since that time. Currently the image is unused and there is little evidence to support the "No rights reserved" claim on the image description page. So, in accordance with Wikipedia:Image file names, I recommend deletion, uploading the image at Image:Cover.jpg and indefinitely protecting. Iamunknown 16:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Protected placeholder showing through. — Rebelguys2 talk 07:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Logo of http://del.ici.us/ (c.f. Image:Del.icio.us logo.png), used only on one user's page (and shouldn't be replaced per WP:FUC#9; so, a copyright image not used under WP:FUC on any main namespace page, should be deleted Iamunknown 16:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- No evidence is apparent to suggest why we should assume that this digital reproduction is "GFDL presumed" Iamunknown 16:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- No evidence is apparent to suggest why we should assume that this digital reproduction is "GFDL presumed" Iamunknown 16:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ronald macdonald (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, suspected copyvio. RJASE1 Talk 17:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Obsolete. A number of free photographs of Jean-Claude Mézières are now available on the Wikimedia Commons at Jean-Claude Mézières — Joe King 18:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Obsoleted by Image:Accuracy and precision.svg — Pekaje 19:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Thai history 0102 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, tagged as possible Copyright violation. Fritz S. (Talk) 22:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Obsolete, Absent uploader, possibly unfree. Fritz S. (Talk) 22:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speculative fictional insignia extrapolated (i.e. ORed from costume pattern; not derived or referable to any identified reliable, secondary source — EEMeltonIV 23:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Closed - image is at Commons - see Commons:Image:Star Trek TNG S1 OF9.png for the description page there. --BigDT 01:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speculative fictional insignia extrapolated (i.e. ORed from costume pattern; not derived or referable to any identified reliable, secondary source — EEMeltonIV 23:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Closed - the image is at Commons - see Commons:Image:Star Trek TNG S1 OF10.png for the description page there if you would like to nominate it for deletion. --BigDT 01:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
