Wikipedia:Peer review/Academy of Art University/archive1
Appearance
Nomination as major contributor — Request peer review of article for accuracy, neutrality, completeness and style according to Wikipedia's featured article criteria for nomination as a featured article candidate at Wikipedia California, Wikipedia Education and/or Wikipedia Education portals. lwalt 17:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- I wouldn't support it as general WP:FA, don't know about the portals, they may have lower standards.
- Very few images compared to other WP:FA#Education articles about active schools.
- General Information seems a very broad section heading, again compare to others above.
- The Controversies section on the other hand seems to get an awful lot of space, and doesn't give equal space to the university's side. The article seems biased against its subject.
- "recognized a participating institution" - as, maybe? Also, kind of a short section.
- "five future fashion designers to watch" needs quotation marks.
- The possessive of "Stephens" is either "Stephens's" or "Stephens'" - experts disagree. In any case, it is not "Stephen's".
- "shot up the Administrative ladder" - overly dramatic metaphor
- What's so controversial about Girl with Curious Hair? From our article it seems innocuous, and nothing to do with serial killing. Improve that article or give a few words here or just remove it here.--AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)