Wikipedia:Peer review/Brandon Routh/archive1
Appearance
Basically as complete as can be at this point in his career. Seems like it could pass GA. Would like to know on how to improve further. I suppose the intro could be expanded, though there isn't much to summarize beyond a point. Mad Jack 07:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles).
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
- There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
- Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like:18 mm
. - Please alphabetize the categories and/or interlanguage links.
- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
- You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
- Thanks, Andy t 15:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- As this is a biographical article, I suggest adding {{persondata}}. Also, instead of using {{Infobox Biography}}, use {{Infobox actor movie}}; it applies more to him and contains more relevant information. --NMajdan•talk 14:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)