Wikipedia:Peer review/History of Blackpool F.C. (1887–1962)/archive1

History of Blackpool F.C. (1887–1962)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I'd like to know which areas are covered too much and which aren't covered enough. I think the article is pretty well referenced, though I'm unsure if I've placed the reference tags in the correct location sentence/paragraph-wise.

Note that the history is across two articles. Navigation is via links at the top of each article.

Thanks, Dudesleeper / Talk 19:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go through the article thoroughly in due course (bug me on my talk page if I don't), but a couple of brief comments from a quick scan through:

For an article of this size the lead is a little thin, I'd suggest three decent sized paragraphs.
The article overwhelmingly relies on a single source. While I don't doubt that Calley is the best book about the club, having >90% of citations to the same reference is excessive when the subject is not overly obscure.
Lots of one or two sentence paragraphs give a stop-start feel in places, possibly due to the temptation to separate out each season. Oldelpaso (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]