Wikipedia:Peer review/Key (basketball)/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Key (basketball)[edit]

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm planning to list this on FA and this article could use some cleanup, plus other grammar or jargon things that need to be sorted out.

Thanks, –Howard the Duck 19:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

  • The lead is a bit short. It should summarize the whole article
  • Make sure it is comprehensive (does it cover all the basketball leagues?)
  • Is www.rolltide.com a reliable source?
  • Images need alt text

Chris!c/t 19:33, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • Lead is pretty easy to remedy, I'll do something about it.
    • Basketball is played either on NBA or FIBA rules, and almost all other leagues comply with the either of the two (although there are hybrids). We can't possibly have rules for every league. I know of one and I can source it, but I dunno the others if they do have deviations
      • Right, but all the notable leagues (e.g. college league, Olympics, etc.) should be mentioned.—Chris!c/t 19:53, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • College leagues in the U.S. use NCAA rules, pro leagues in the U.S. use NBA rules, while other countries and practically all international tourneys use FIBA rules, although some modify their rules as a compromise between the two, But in terms of the "key" it's either the NCAA, NBA or FIBA, there is no middle ground on this, although some courts have both marks on the court but they use only one code's mark on a game. –Howard the Duck 13:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • This is just my advice. As long as the article is comprehensive, I think you are fine.—Chris!c/t 05:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • The PDF from rolltide.com is identical to the original NCAA one which has been deleted/died.
    • Alt text will be dealt with later. –Howard the Duck 19:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Question, with the first three photos virtually showing the same thing, is it a good idea to give them identical alt texts? How about for the fourth one (the drawing)? –Howard the Duck 13:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Nothing wrong with that. The drawing still needs alt text.—Chris!c/t 05:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Done. The first one, is "quite" different as the last two photos. –Howard the Duck 16:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]