Wikipedia:Peer review/List of auxiliary Interstate Highways/archive1
How is the super long table containing the complete list of the auxiliary Interstate Highways? For me, because it contains so much information required for my computer to download every time I view the page, it takes me about 1 or 2 minutes. Does anyone think that it takes so long to download upon viewing the article? Artisol2345 (not Aristotle) [talk to me or follow me] 03:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- This is not what peer review is for. --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, this is the first time I'm actually learning on how to use this. So what is peer review for, anyway? Artisol2345 (not Aristotle) [talk to me or follow me] 03:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- You ask questions about getting the article to WP:GA or WP:FA. --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, can we ask how we can make the article to the featured list? It's more like a list rather than an article.
02:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Read the WP:FLC. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, can we ask how we can make the article to the featured list? It's more like a list rather than an article.
Also, do you by any chance recommend that this page should be deleted?Artisol2345 (not Aristotle) [talk to me or follow me] 03:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)Never mind about it. I think the table looks good already.Artisol2345 (not Aristotle) [talk to me or follow me] 21:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)- Please disregard my last two questions that I have crossed out.
02:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hmm... the list needs more time. Many editors do not agree this article will qualify for the featured lists. I'll see what I can do for the time being...
00:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)