Wikipedia:Peer review/List of wind farm projects in Romania/archive1
List of wind farm projects in Romania[edit]
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because i would like to list it as a featured list candidate and i would like to know some oppinions.
Thanks, Mario1987 21:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: This is an interesting and useful list. I made some minor proofing changes, and I have a few other suggestions for improvement.
Lead
- "As of 2008, wind power in Romania has an installed capacity of 76 megawatts (MW), up from the seven MW installed capacity in 2007." WP:NBSP says in part, "Wikipedia recommends the use of a non-breaking space (also known as a hard space) when necessary to prevent the end-of-line displacement of elements that would be awkward at the beginning of a new line... ". This applies to constructions such as 76 MW and all other similar cases in the lead. I see that you have already added nbsps to some instances in the lead but not all. You don't need to add non-breaking spaces to these constructions in the table because there they cannot become separated. So just a few places need fixing.
- "The Romanian company Blue Investment will invest US$ 84... " - The space needs to be removed from between the $ and the digits; thus: US$84. Except for this first instance, you don't need to repeat the US part of this, just $1.65 billion, for example, will do.
- Wikilink turbine?
- "with a 100-metre (330 ft) hub height" - I don't see anything to link to for "hub height". I think this must mean the height of the turbine hub above the ground. Would it be helpful to add a brief explanation like that to the text?
- "99-metre (320 ft) rotor diameters" - I think the rotor diameter must refer to the blades. Would it be helpful to briefly explain this in the text?
- "surpassing the Maranchon Wind Farm, the current largest wind farm" - Rather than "current", it might be useful to specify "the largest wind farm as of August 2009".
- "The technical wind potential designed for Romania... " - "of Romania" rather than "designed for Romania"?
- "The Romanian company Blue Investment will invest US$ 84 million in a Baia, Tulcea County based 35-MW wind farm that will have... " - Suggestion: "The Romanian company Blue Investment will invest $84 million in a 35-MW wind farm in Baia, Tulcea County, that will have... ".
References
- WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency says in part, "Dates in article references should all have the same format." For this reason, you should pick either yyyy-mm-dd or d-m-y and make them all the same. Since most of the ones that you have are in yyyy-mm-dd format, I'd suggest changing the other ones to conform.
- Names of newspapers and magazines should appear in italics.
- Citation 4 seems to be dead or malfunctioning.
I hope these suggestions prove helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article on a topic of your choice. Finetooth (talk) 04:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
