Wikipedia:Peer review/Monte Ne/archive1

This article needs some copy editing and then it should be ready for GA. --The_stuart 15:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a high-quality article generally. I'd say the quality of written English was fine, so don't worry too much about copy-editing (although there are a couple of typos and broken wikilinks). The only problem with the article is that there are too few sources; quite a few quotes and statements of fact are given in the article without sources. However, as this isn't a controversial topic, that shouldn't be a problem. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 17:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more references and wikilinks throughout. M3tal H3ad 00:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]