Wikipedia:Peer review/Natasha Demkina/archive1
Hello, I am requesting WP:PR for this article not so much in an attempt for FAC, but because I feel it needs more focused NPOV input both from those within and without the topic area (scientific theory and experimentation, especially on controversial subjects). The article seems to be in a stable (though abrogated) state for now, but earnest disputes continue. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 18:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes it is quite short. Her biographical background is quite terse; there is nothing about her family or background influences she might have had that led her to this practice. I think that by presenting both points of view, the debate concerning her test could be expanded without damaging the neutrality. Is she still continuing her readings while attending the university? Thanks. — RJH 16:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- I currently find it neutral. However, the article can be significantly expanded and as that happens POVs will emerge. Here are two other csicop articles [1] and [2] to help that expansion out. --maclean25 08:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)