Wikipedia:Peer review/Out 1/archive1
Just today came out of an extremely rare screening of this film in its entirety and would like to work on it as much as possible immediately, while my memory (and access to external sources) is still very fresh! (It's 12+ hours long, btw...) Would love to see this really polished up nicely for a possible FA nom. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola 02:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- The second paragraph of the "Plot and themes" section is too long, and should be broken up into a few separate paragraphs (doing more wiki-linking wouldn't hurt either!).
- The article should have inline citations (FA criteria 2(c)), generally done in the form of WP:FOOTNOTEs.
- More can be added to increase the comprehensiveness of this article, including reactions to the film, budget, etc. (examples of other film FAs can be found at WP:FA#Media)
Thanks, AndyZ t 19:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to archive this PR at the moment. Unfortunately my outside work is building up and I feel that I am unable at the moment to give the article the attention it would need to be properly vetted for a successful peer review. Please accept my apologies and rest assured that I will both address the comments already given and re-list this for a proper review when time permits. Thank you, Girolamo Savonarola 22:42, 1 May 2006 (UTC)