Wikipedia:Peer review/Racialism/archive1

Racialism[edit]

I am currently taking a break from contributing to articles, so I cannot attend to this myself. The article is undergoing very questionable revisions by Sam Spade. Some selected versions from the article's revision history to consider:

19 Aug., primarily by Sam Spade.

14 Sept., primarily by myself.

19 Nov., primarily by myself.

Current (22 Nov.), by Sam Spade.

I, also, am the one who contributed every-single reference, which I now very much regret as it lends credibility to Sam Spade's very questionable revisions and deletionism. Should 'racialism' involve the current Racial Sepratist movement to such an extent, is perhaps a key question El_C

I would like to note that I do not find the current three participants in the article to be sufficiently qualified and/or impartial for the task. I strongly encourage Peer Review from those participants yet to be involved in editing the article recently, especially those with some preliminary (or better yet, beyond) background with the subject. Thanks. El_C

I would like to note that I have found El_C incapable of neutrality and factual accuracy in relation to matters of racist and communist POV. I welcome any outside involvement which emphasises NPOV, and would point out that since El_C's departure, the article has become stable and the neutrality dispute removed (not added nor removed by myself). While editing the page he was consistantly counter-consensus, and his departure appears to have achieved consensus. 'Nuff said. Sam Spade

I would question the POV ability of anyone who uses the phrase "I personally"... --62.252.192.6 22:47, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

While, I appreciate the support, Anon., please do not use proxies to convey your thoughts on this as it detracts from the credibility (sock puppet-wise) of our non-Racialist apologist, NPOV position. El_C

Consensus among three people whom, I believe, lack sufficient familiarity with the term beyond its use in the Racial Separatist movement. I would also like to reiterate that I find Sam's tactics to be highly questionable. El_C