Wikipedia:Picture peer review/arlingtonmemorialbridge
Appearance
I am not sure this deserves to be a FP but it is my first panorama and I just wanted some feedback.
- Creator
- Remember (talk) 18:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nominated by
- Remember (talk) 18:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- I Like Not bad for your first try. I found some stitching errors (SE) and distortion errors (DE) in the image, but it brought back fond memories of my college days (GWU '08 baby!). If you want to reach FP, I think the 1000px requirement is still in place (in this case, in the tall direction), even for panoramas (which I believe is different from Commons FPC). Used well in the article though. Due to the errors in stitching, not sure it would pass for VP either. What stitching software do you use? Your other photos on your userpage are great though. Here are the stitching and distortion errors I found:
|
South Side of Bridge:
|
~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 00:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments. I used the free software that came with my HP printer so I am sure it is not the most up to date stiching software (but it is all I got). Remember (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- I used the same software before I bought PTGui. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 17:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments. I used the free software that came with my HP printer so I am sure it is not the most up to date stiching software (but it is all I got). Remember (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Try using Autostitch which is a great free stitching software. --Muhammad(talk) 16:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- It probably wouldn't pass at 400 pixels high. Also, there is no need to go around more than once. 360 degrees is the widest needed to cover the whole thing. Thirdly the view from on the bridge mightn't be so popular due to the distortion of straight lines etc mandated by the projection. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)