Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 August 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Back to main feedback page
Index of all pages

User:Mono666/My_City_Burning_(band)[edit]

Hi, I was wondering if this article uses the correct form of 'references'. also, I am not sure how to post it. Do I submit it (it seems I can't yet) or do I need permission somewhere?

Thanks.

Mono666 (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comptel_Corporation[edit]

The wikipedia page is about a software company called Comptel Corporation. The article wishes to concentrate on the history, awards, news and product base about the company at one space. The current page contains basic information, but will be edited further once it is reviewed by wikipedia and deemed fit for further additions.


Salmisaarelainen (talk) 11:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

You need more third party sources, meaning that you cannot cite the company's own website as a reference. Unless third party sources are not found, this article may be deleted from Wikipedia. Miguel AG (talk) 13:00, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_2_Bears[edit]

Request to remove blue under construction-style notice at the top of the page.

Gcoh (talk) 12:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

I don't see anything wrong with the article. I have removed the unreviewed template. Miguel AG (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Low Key (Regine Velasquez album)[edit]

The article is about the album of Regine Velasquez called Low Key. I would like to kindly ask for someone to get some feedback for this article. Thank you in advance.

Rovheel (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

This article looks fine to me. Thank you for contributing this to Wikipedia. I have remove the unreviewed template. Miguel AG (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Toyo Shibata[edit]

Please review my article on Toyo Shibata. Thanks.

Dante8 (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

This article needs expansion. With that much of references, it should not be a problem. I have removed the unreviewed template. Miguel AG (Talk to me!) Review me! 13:49, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Chris Rodda[edit]

Please review my article on Chris Rodda. Thanks.

Dante8 (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Shehla Masood[edit]

I need more data on biography.


Sudhir.swarnkar (talk) 15:44, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Flow Science, Inc.[edit]

I'd be very grateful if somone could please review my "Flow Science, Inc." article. Once it has been reviewed, I'm guessing that either I or the reviewer would then remove the "unreviewed" tag from the top of the page. Let me know if I'm wrong about that, though. Thank you very much!


Michael Leeman (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Sophieneville/Sophie Neville[edit]

I am mentioned in Wikipedia already on the Swallows and Amazons film page but do not yet have my own profile page - this draft is under construction and I would appreciate feedback to improve upon it, and permission to place it as a full article. Sophieneville (talk) 17:44, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOT#FACEBOOK. Thanks, Nathan2055talk - review 18:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
WP:PSCOI would also be a good read. --Nathan2055talk - review 18:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Nathan2055/Wuhu Island[edit]

I have been working on this article after Wuhu Island got deleted, and would like some review. Please leave {{Feedbackreply-sm}} on my talk page when you reply, so I can get the big new message bar and respond quicker. Thanks!


Nathan2055talk - review 18:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Bill Todd[edit]

Requesting feedback, not only to remove "new article" template but also because I could not find a LinkedIn profile for Todd and therefore feel less certain of his current employment and status than I do for some of the other people on whom I have recently prepare articles, whom I did find on LinkedIn.

Gildir (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Monsey Church[edit]

Would someone please be willing to look at my article and let me know what they think? It's my first substantial contribution. I'd be grateful.

Pwdennis2 (talk) 21:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

That's you first substantial contribution!? It looks like a featured article! Congrats! To be honest, I think it's ready for good article review. Thanks, Nathan2055talk - review 21:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Nathan2055. That's very nice of you to say. I appreciate your taking the time to review it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pwdennis2 (talkcontribs) 22:55, 16 August 2011
Any time. I did see a few places where more citations might be needed. I marked them with a {{cn}}. Thanks, Nathan2055talk - review 23:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Melodic learning[edit]

How can the warnings be removed from this page?

Jharrisonpr 21:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Inline citations had already been added and the article already has enough citations, so I have removed both of the warnings. The article looks good, by the way, so I have also removed the unreviewed template. Miguel AG (talk) Review me! 23:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Miguel AG! Now to work on the orphan status...--Jharrisonpr 22:07, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Terreform[edit]

Please review this new article.


MITclubfact (talk) 01:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)