Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Christos Megalou

Christos Megalou

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Konstantinos Alexandrou (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Shadowowl (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Draft:Christos Megalou (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

{{{links}}}

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Shouldn't the biggest bank in Greece have a page about its' CEO?
2. The submission isn't an advertisement, it is a formal reference like all the CEO pages in Wikipedia's environment.

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Konstantinos Alexandrou (talk) 08:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject: The non-filing-party rejected acceptance by removing his name from the party list and listing this page for deletion. I've reverted the removal and opposed the deletion request to preserve the Committee's records, but the case is rejected by the Committee for failure to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation". I would note to the filing party, however, that the rejection of a draft does not qualify for mediation since the simple remedy is to either correct the page or to move the page into the mainspace as a "live" article and see if it survives. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 22:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson)