Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Lunca de Jos
Appearance
Lunca de Jos
[edit]Formal mediation case | |
---|---|
Article | Lunca de Jos (talk) |
Opened | 02 Jun 2010 |
Mediator | Not yet assigned |
Status | Awaiting a mediator (?) |
Notes | None |
Dispute specifics
[edit]- Involved users
- Articles concerned in this dispute
- Lunca de Jos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Miercurea-Ciuc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Lunca de Sus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
Issues to be mediated
[edit]- Primary issues
- Inclusion in the lead of the article of settlements from Romania in the "Szekely land" territorial administrative unit/region which ceased to exist almost 150 years. (Said region no longer exists.)
- Inclusion of political maps of Szekely land in the articles of settlements.
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
[edit]- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign within seven days, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk page.
- Agree. iadrian (talk) 02:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Agree.Rokarudi--Rokarudi 06:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
[edit]- A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section; all comments should go on the talk page, unless a party is specifically requested to reply here by a Committee member.
- Accept. For the Mediation Committee, AGK 18:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- I can take this case. Andrevan@ 22:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Case closed. Andrevan@ 19:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- I can take this case. Andrevan@ 22:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)