Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2012/February/12

February 12[edit]

Regional US geography parent categories[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep

While I appreciate why these were originally created, now that each state (and D.C.!) have their own individual categories, I think we can do away with the regional categories. Propose deleting the following:

Propose that the individual state and district categories would then be alphabetized under Cat:United States geography stubs. Other categories should not need to be brought to the higher level, because they're already covered. For instance Cat:Western United States building and structure stubs‎ is already a child of Cat:United States building and structure stubs‎. Dawynn (talk) 11:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On the category that I checked this Stfd was not advertised. Anyway these regions appear to be "official" subdivisions/groupings of the US so I think it would make sense to keep them from at least a local perspective. As an outsider I would not know into which group to place for example Minesota, but hey thats only one click away to find out. Agathoclea (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

India Films[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was not a stub category discussion

Is it necessary to have:

Bollywood films
Bengali films
Kannada films
Malayalam films
Tamil films
Telugu films

and these 6 categoies in each year yet? That has to be 100++ categories at least. :- ) DCS 04:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was way off. Discounting Bollywood films, the 5 languages contain 4712 categories in film. :- ) DCS 04:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you're barking up the wrong tree. We don't have that many India film stub categories. However, I do see Wikipedia has several main categories, as you say. Please direct your question to the India cinema task force. Dawynn (talk) 16:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thx :- ) DCS 19:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.