Help desk
< April 24	<< Mar \| April \| May >>	April 26 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

April 25

04:07:41, 25 April 2017 review of submission by Hankthetank78

Hankthetank78 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Justin (JMHHACKER) Matthew (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

HankTheTank (talk) 04:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How is this not enough notable sources?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Justin_(JMHHACKER)_Matthew

The draft doesn't start by stating what its subject is, is written in unacceptably promotional language, and seems to be largely a rant about how its (unspecified) subject is notable. For example, the shortest sentence in the draft reads "He has made a widely recognized contribution that is in his specific field." Who has? What field? What contribution? Who says that it's widely recognized? Maproom (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

07:00:39, 25 April 2017 review of submission by Stingslp02141989

Stingslp02141989 (talk · contribs)

I would like to know which sources we used in the reference are not verifiable? Is the source below a reliable source according to Wikipedia requirements? http://www.finsmes.com/2016/05/solar-asset-management-firm-radian-generation-receives-investment-from-solar-plus-international.html http://strattonreport.com/news/radiangen-closes-new-round-investment-solar-plus-international/ Stingslp02141989 (talk) 07:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've no view on whether it's reliable. But I doubt that it's independent. It looks to me to be based on a press release. As it says in the rejection note for the draft, "Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Maproom (talk) 10:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:36:15, 25 April 2017 review of submission by Arsenl2017

Arsenl2017 (talk · contribs)
- Gryphon Investors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Arsenl2017 (talk) 17:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon. I recently participated in the creation of an article on Gryphon Investors. The article was accepted for publication several weeks ago. Its TALK page indexes in search engines, but the article itself does not. Two things I note: 1. On the Page Information page, it says that the article page is indexable. 2. In the lines of code within the article page, I see 'noindex/nofollow'. Is there a setting that needs to be changed?

Thank you.

Arsenl2017 (talk) 17:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arsen. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Our apologies for the delay in response. I see that your question has already been answered at the Teahouse. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:26, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]