Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 August 19
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < August 18 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 20 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
August 19
[edit]05:25:14, 19 August 2017 review of submission by Annonymous4
[edit]- Annonymous4 (talk · contribs)
I'm requesting a re-review in order to not get my page deleted, so it can be reviewed before publishing it. I don't know why I've been getting the page that I wrote about a persons, I know that I've given enough information for importance, I've reviewed it and edited as much as I can to prove that is an actual person who is very known and should have a Wikipedia page!
- Hello, Annonymous. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Your submission has been declined twice, both times for failing to demonstrate notability. And it's easy to see why this happened -- despite your claim to the contrary, you haven't provided any proof for anything you've written in the draft. The only reference you have given is IMDB, which is user-generated and, hence, not accepted here as a reliable source. What's more, the biography at that site appears to have been written by you! Unless you can show that the subject has received substantial coverage from reliable independent sources, it is very unlikely that your draft will be accepted for publication. I hope this response has been helpful. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
14:53:24, 19 August 2017 review of submission by Abhijit.b2819
[edit]- Abhijit.b2819 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
She is Recognised MODEL IN ESATERN INDIA , so why is her page not getting created in WIKIPEDIA?
- Hello, Abhijit. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Being a model in eastern India is not going to be sufficient for having an article here on Wikipedia. For that, you are going to need to demonstrate that the subject has received significant in-depth coverage from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. You haven't even begun to make that demonstration, so I think you are have quite a bit of work ahead of you. Good luck with the research. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)