Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject College basketball/Collaboration of the Month

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject
College basketball
Overview
Project page talk
Participants talk
Project category talk
Departments
Assessment (log) talk
Article alerts talk
Cleanup listing
Unassessed articles (1414)
Unknown importance (9858)
Featured articles (22)
Featured lists (16)
Good articles (263)
Total WPCBB articles (57964)
Resources and Guides
Master team table talk
Popular pages talk
Research sources talk
Templates talk
Yearbook references talk
Yearly team pages format talk
Tools
Active editors talk
CBB Welcome Template talk
Project banner talk
Project Userbox talk
Important Articles
2024–25 NCAA men's
DI season
talk
2024–25 men's rankings talk
2025 men's DI tournament talk
2024–25 NCAA women's
DI season
talk
2024–25 women's rankings talk
2025 women's DI tournament talk
viewtalkeditchanges

Welcome to the College bsketball Collaboration of the Month! The collaboration seeks to identify articles within the area of college basketball that require improvement. Every month, a single article will be selected for collaboration, and everyone will try to work on it as much as possible.

Nominating articles

[edit]

To nominate an article, add

===[[Name of article]]===

Nomination text. ~~~~

'''Support'''

# ~~~~

'''Comments'''

This should be added at the bottom of the list of candidates, filling in the name of the article and the nomination text (which should indicate why the article would benefit from a collaboration and what needs to be improved).

To be come the monthly collaboration, articles may be voted on and nominated for a period of up to a week. Votes and nominations may be cast towards the last week of the month, until a clear majority is decided. If there is a tie, the article deemed higher on the importance scale than the other will be used as the collaboration.

Current Collaboration

[edit]

The largest enemy of Duke in the ACC, I believe it of most importance to create the basketball article to the Tar Heels at the soonest possible time. With one of the top ranked teams in the country right now, the article will surely be a hot-spot of visitors if made. NomaderTalk 04:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. NomaderTalk 04:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Daveahern 16:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Candidates for Next Collaboration

[edit]

Should we be looking at another collaboration? I don't know how successful the last one was, since the article still needs a lot of work. Perhaps we should scrap this entirely - it's definitely been more than a month. matt91486 01:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]