List of approved article revisions[edit]

September 2006[edit]

This revision of Globular cluster
This revision of Belton House

Talk[edit]

Meh?[edit]

I don't understand this, what are you talking about? Soa P 16:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read Wikipedia:Approved article revisions? —this is messedrocker (talk) 18:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article[edit]

Why was this article delisted? It had no NPOV issues, was well-written, well-balanced and said all it had to say.

Also, why are all nomination from this is messedrocker from FA material. These articles don't really need to have a stable revision because they are on everybody's watchlist and they are reverted in seconds. What this project should aim at are articles that aren't on people's watchlist that are well-written and need to be stable in order to prevent the readers to see the vandalism. Lincher 18:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article has unsourced material, which is no good for an article that we are basically saying is one of the best things we can offer. Also, it should be noted that approved article revisions are not about anti-vandalism, they're about offering articles acceptable by our standards. Over time, the quality of featured articles will degrade, so we want to capture that high quality now before it degrades. —this is messedrocker (talk) 19:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

4288[edit]

Please support bug 4288 which is an enhancement that allows general tagging of revisions. This will allow user and group defined tags which can then be used for things like this project and possibly other stuff in the future. Thanks. --Gbleem 23:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]