Wikipedia talk:Future event
Appearance
![]() | Essays Low‑impact ![]() | |||||||||
|
How about displaying trends
[edit]- Is it appropriate to display a graph with trend lines projected into the future? What are resonable limits on doing so?
- If the extrapolated trend is the best available from a reasonably large set of mathematical models, and is displayed with a prediction interval, does that properly address concerns about extrapolation? --James S. 22:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
What is this?
[edit]Why is there no tag explaining what this is? I take it that this is an essay, judging by the page layout, and not guideline/policy. J Milburn 22:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Temporal template
[edit]Probably should let people know about future event tags for articles that haven't happened yet. Should add a link to: Category:Temporal templates and/or Wikipedia:Current and future event templates Oh Snap 02:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Russia admits that parts of its failed Fobos-Grunt spacecraft may crash into the earth during the next week. (The Telegraph)
99.181.142.9 (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Per Fobos-Grunt#Reentry, "The probe is expected to reenter on January 15, 2012 at 14:00 UTC +/- 18 Hours; the reentry zone is not yet predicted.[55]" 99.181.135.129 (talk) 13:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Results of the 2020 Rio Carnival listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Results of the 2020 Rio Carnival. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)