Wikipedia talk:Hutchinson Encyclopedia topics

Hutchinson is weird, and not very good! Some of it looks as if it's been OCRed, or just retyped very badly. No reason not to have lots of redirects - the fact that something's in Hutchinson, even if misspelt, means that someone might come looking for it in Wikipedia. OpenToppedBus - My Talk 09:27, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

They dont even have birth/death dates in a lot of their articles! as for redirects, I think you just have to make a judgement, e.g. is it plain stupid or is it a possible/common typo? Bluemoose 11:26, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Article??

Is there a reason why there is no wikipedia article on the Hutchinson Encyclopedia itself? It seems kind of funny to be doing all this work and not even have a page about the encyclopedia.... Womble 06:02, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you google "Hutchinson encyclopedia" (and i mean the whole www, not just wikipedia), this project is the 5th result! I'll make a stub for it now. Martin - The non-blue non-moose 09:13, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wrack

The Hutchinson Encyclopedia entry for wrack just gives a dictionary definition as an archaic variation of rack, and so I don't think it needs an article in wikipedia. Should it just be deleted from the list or what? --G Rutter 21:33, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I'd like to see at least a redirect for every article listed in any of the encyclopedias such as EB, Hutchinson, Nuttall, etc... Perhaps you could put in a brief entry with a link to the Wiktionary article on "rack" ? Womble 09:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]