Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-02-04/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Clubs

Have to be fully involved

I'm not sure if I was allowed to comment there. GoodDay (talk) 22:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heeeelloooooo, is their anybody out there? I'm in a Mediation Cabal, all by myself. GoodDay (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an ineffective means of dispute resolution, doesn't it? Mooretwin (talk) 21:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where's BigDunc? he should be here. GoodDay (talk) 21:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was supposed to be uninvolved mediators who got involved? Mooretwin (talk) 21:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't you involved? GoodDay (talk) 21:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. And hence, by definition, I am not uninvolved. Mooretwin (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So, there should only be 3 individuals at this Cable: Mooretwin, BigDunc & an uninvolved mediator? GoodDay (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I get it now. This is between the 2 of you & an involved editor (preferrably an administrator). GoodDay (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know - I'm just pointing out that there are supposed to be mediators involved, yet none is. I'm not suggesting you shouldn't be here. Mooretwin (talk) 22:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was 'briefly' involved, weeks ago. On reflection, I can't be seen as neutral. GoodDay (talk) 22:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]