Wikipedia talk:NUS Scholars Programme

USP[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:School and university projects. While we do welcome good encyclopedic contributions, please do the following:

Please keep this project page updated. But do not put the logo or the list of the articles in every article. See ownership of articles and avoiding self-references.
Put this logo in the talk: page of each article not in the article and provide a link to this project page - that is not self-reference because it is in the talk page.
Put a licence tag on the logo!

Please let all the others involved in this project see the above. Oh, and they are not "Wikipedia Sites", they are Wikipedia articles or pages. -- RHaworth 10:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Topic selection[edit]

To whoever organizing this programme,

Most of the topics in the current list are not suitable for wikipedia. I briefly look through the list, only Northlight School and Young Women Muslim Association of Singapore, and a few others are appropriate. I'm afraid most of the other articles, if created, are likely to be deleted by the wikipedia community.
For more suitable topics, I encourage you to look at Wikipedia:SGpedians' notice board for a list of requested articles as well as the list of articles to improve and expand.
If you have any question or comment, please feel free to post a message at Wikipedia talk:SGpedians' notice board or at my talk page User talk:Vsion.

Regards, --Vsion 05:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid...[edit]

I'm seeing so much WP:SYN or sheer duplicated material in these articles that the majority of them will not escape deletion. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-21 02:31Z

I removed the logo from Convenience stores in Singapore along with a large list linking to other articles started by this group. These were inappropriately placed. Once I discovered this page, I was surprised to find little information about the group or what the project is about. --Strangerer (Talk) 16:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- To me, more annoying than any of their actual article edits is their total lack of any discussion. -- RHaworth 17:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Maybe it's a sociological experiment to test how we respond to the subtle placement of mediocre articles. nadav 08:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Very good thesis. =P SpLo T // 09:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Logo[edit]

Their logo is a derivative work of the NUS official logo. [1] —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-21 23:35Z