Wikipedia talk:No racists

Endorsers

The following editors endorse the contents of this essay:

1. FormalDude talk
2. Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
3. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 06:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
4. Andre🚐 21:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
5. TitanAndromeda 19:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
6. — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 03:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
7. Goddamn right. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 23:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
8. --MikutoH ^talk! 02:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Non endorsers

1. Let's also ban every other political ideology, or remain strictly neutral. -Crainsaw (Talk) 20:51, 28th May 2023 (UTC)
2. No. The basic definition of racism is not belief in differences. It is discrimination. The record in 100 meter dash belongs to the West African ancestry. It does not divide humanity on Racists and denialists.
   Genetic difference between races might be fundamental and meaningful and is a conventional scientific hypothesis. The categorization of humans into "races" has been considered a pseudoscientific idea by educational authorities at UNESCO and elsewhere and career-oriented pseudo-scientists since the 1960s unrelated to the discovery of molecular genetics and other discoveries. See Wikipedia:Topics where reliable sources should be banned from Wikipedia indefinitely. Because anti-racists advance their anti-genetic belief as absolute truth (usually in favor of environmental determinism), they deny empiricism and the scientific method.--Maxaxa (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

   I was waiting for someone to bring out that tired old argument "racism just means genetic superiority". Sigh. (Not surprised to see that they've been indeffed.) Cheers, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 15:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

   The arguement is old and never gets tired. It will outlive your last sigh. Cheers 199.203.190.82 (talk) 21:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)