Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Game Shows

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Television Game Shows (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Television Game Shows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of game shows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Archival[edit]

Archive 1[edit]

The first talk page has been archived. See it here. --Son (talk) 01:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Archive 2[edit]

The second talk page has been archived. See it here. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement[edit]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Panel Game[edit]

There's a subgenre of game show known as the panel game or panel show, which has its own article. But that article is unsourced and could use some attention. I think it falls nicely into the purview of the game show project. 72.244.207.30 (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

For that matter, the game show entry could use a lot of work. 72.244.207.30 (talk) 01:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Most Popular TV Gameshows in the World[edit]

Some group members may want to include the most popular TV gameshows in the world[1]? Best, Mentalmoses (talk) 18:20, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Update[edit]

Today, I performed a major update to the project's main page and its assessment page to conform with our policies and guidelines and also expanded the main page, using WP:Star Wars as a model. I am alerting the project members of my actions and I hope these were not excessive. Please review the updated pages and post any comments or concerns here. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:40, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Jeopardy! GAN[edit]

Jeopardy! is up for Good Article Nomination. Anyone who has not significantly contributed to this article may review it here. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Updates to TV#MOS[edit]

I'm not sure how many people monitor WP:MOSTV or even WP:TV (the basic WikiProject for all of us), but we've been trying to get some feedback on additions to the TV Manual of Style. It largely has to do with the inclusion of "Overview" tables at the start of the page, the order in which season lists are presented (currently, there is no concrete order), and what is considered too much info for DVDs (i.e. should we be placing every detail about the box set in the article, from each interview to the aspect ratio, or should be keep it more generalized). Please see discussion at WT:MOSTV#Updates to the MOS. Thank you.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Featured Article Nomination: Hal Block[edit]

I've nominated Hal Block article here: [2] as a Featured Article Candidate. If anyone here has an interest in the history of TV game shows you might know Block. The article isn't getting a huge response and, if it doesn't get promoted, I would at least like people who are interested in the topic to have a look at it. Thanks, BashBrannigan (talk) 01:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Game show articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release[edit]

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Game show articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Sunday, November 14th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of November, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 16:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

MHP FAR[edit]

I have nominated Monty Hall problem for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Tijfo098 (talk) 22:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

file:Jeopardy.PNG[edit]

image:Jeopardy.PNG has been nominated for deletion. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 06:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune[edit]

I have filed a peer review on the Wheel of Fortune (US game show) article because I would like to know what could make the article better. Please add feedback here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:11, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Merger of this project into WikiProject Television as a task force[edit]

It has been suggested that this project be merged into WikiProject Television as a task force since it might be inactive or semi-active. After reviewing this project that it appears that there have not been any active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. If you have questions or comments, please let us know. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 06:57, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Its been 6 days without discussions, any comments? JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 08:28, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

This WikiProject mentions insufficiently the notability. Also, this has guidelines that lack needs of reliable sources. I have lack of interest on television game shows anymore, and I don't feel energetic enough to change the guidelines or policies. --George Ho (talk) 06:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

I have a total lack of interest in the subject also, and for me it's always been the case, but what's the relevance of our common disinterest to the project, as long as others are interested? DGG ( talk ) 02:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
As I said, there is no considerations about notability, original research, reliable sources, and other policies and guidelines that should apply to this Project. Right now, it consists of gameplay, rules, and something that relates to primarily the game shows. For example, Plinko has issues that should be addressed. By the way, I know the rules and gameplays of Family Feud, Wheel of Fortune, and Jeopardy!. Is it an original research to insert gameplay whose source is the game show itself? I mean, look at List of The Price Is Right pricing games: its source is the game show itself, and it consists of active and retired games. I assumed: they have followed WP Game Show guidelines but not Wikipedia guidelines and policies. --George Ho (talk) 03:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
  • What, exactly, do you want comments on? This is unclear. Hipocrite (talk) 13:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
    • I'll rephrase: the project page is a mess. It lacks importance of quality standards, such as notability and research. The rest on the page is almost trivial. Have I clarified enough? --George Ho (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
The Wikiproject Game Shows page is hardly "a mess". IMO, it explains quite clearly what should be included in game show article and what shouldn't. If you think some policy or guideline is missing, simply add it. Regarding what constitutes original research, that can be found on WP:OR, which I think is explained clearly. In regards to works of entertainment such as a game show, it is acceptable to use the work itself as a source. Once people start culling their observations from said works, that is when it veers off into original research. OR is fairly cut and dry and I think most people realize that. If you have an issue with a particular article, I suggest you raise your concerns on that particular article talk page. As far as I know, the Wikiproject page itself does not have to adhere to Wikipedia standards and policies and does not have to meet any notability standards. Projects are simply created so like-minded folks can focus on a particular topic and (hopefully) bringing it up to encyclopedic standards. Pinkadelica 08:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Well, notability guidelines should be added in this page, yet I'm too busy with other things, such as Sam Malone and Diane Chambers. Can you do it, please? --George Ho (talk) 20:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
If you're too busy with other things, this RfC should have waited until you had the time to fix what you think is wrong. Again, bringing up an issue and expecting others to fix it because you're busy is counterproductive. Concentrate on one thing at a time - Wikipedia isn't going to crash and burn because something isn't fixed straight away. That said, this project is a branch of WP:TV. That project page covers notability guidelines specific to television shows. I honestly don't see the need in repeating guidelines that are already covered there. Perhaps I'm giving my fellow editors the benefit of the doubt in thinking they can find these guidelines without a link on every page. Considering the size and scope of this project, I think the 17 or so people who are a part of it are also aware that game shows fall under TV show guidelines and know to follow those guidelines accordingly. Pinkadelica 21:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
...The "Mission Statement" section refers guidelines and policies. Nevertheless, is it enough, or should I expand it? --George Ho (talk) 01:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Expand it to what? To include yet another link to WP:TV where the specific guidelines related to television shows are already listed? I mean, I don't get what you want to page to say or why this is even an issue. If you feel that you need to add a section linking to those guidelines - have at it. Pinkadelica 02:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

I have added one line, which mentions OR, notability, and verifiability. Is that enough? --George Ho (talk) 02:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Fullscreen capture 10162011 72225 PM.jpg[edit]

file:Fullscreen capture 10162011 72225 PM.jpg (Scrabble Showdown) has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 22:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Wales on millionaire.jpg[edit]

File:Wales on millionaire.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 06:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Kirk Fogg for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirk Fogg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirk Fogg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RJaguar3 | u | t 16:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Andrew Kravis nominated for deletion[edit]

The article Andrew Kravis has been nominated for deletion; you are welcome to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Kravis. RJaguar3 | u | t 02:37, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Leaflet for Wikiproject Television Game Shows at Wikimania 2014[edit]

Project Leaflet WikiProject Medicine back and front v1.png

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:

Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 10:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal[edit]

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live![edit]

WikiProject X icon.svg

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

List of British game shows[edit]

List of British game shows is a mess, no lede, no references, no categories. Someone needs to take a look at it.--Launchballer 18:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Price Is Right (1956 U.S. game show) listed at Requested moves[edit]

Information.svg

A requested move discussion has been initiated for The Price Is Right (1956 U.S. game show) to be moved to The Price Is Right (original U.S. game show). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 00:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Pointless (game show) listed at Requested moves[edit]

Information.svg

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Pointless (game show) to be moved to Pointless. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:30, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

QI listed at Requested moves[edit]

Information.svg

A requested move discussion has been initiated for QI to be moved to QI (UK TV series). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Game Show Network listed at Requested moves[edit]

Information.svg

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Game Show Network to be moved to GSN (TV network). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Panel show listed at Requested moves[edit]

Information.svg

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Panel show to be moved to Panel game. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Games shows are not in the purview of this project?[edit]

I see that tournament style game shows (round after round of play with eliminations in each round over multiple episodes); and season long games; and challenge-style shows (the game is to complete a challenge); do not count as game shows? (they get debannered) Isn't this supposed to be the game show project? (ie. you play a game and at the end you win or lose, on TV) -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 04:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

I think that is because some of those aren't necessarily the same as a game show but more of a Reality show. Can you give an example? retched (talk) 20:12, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
@65.94.171.217: I agree with Retched above. Shows like Survivor, American Idol, The Amazing Race, etc, are generally considered reality competitions that span through weeks, not game shows. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 20:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
American Gladiators -- people play physical games, over a season long tournament with eispodic elimination to win the prize at the end of the season. American Ninja Warrior -- people play physical games over an episode elimination style to make it to the next round to win a prize over a season long tournamnent. All American Handyman is a physical skills challenge full season tournament. If Dog Eat Dog (game show) is a "game show" but uses reality competition (weird physical challenges), why aren't others? They also play games to win at the end. That they are reality TV does not seem to not make it a game show, since all they do is play set games to win the show, instead of information knowledge challenges. -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 05:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Because Dog Eat Dog is a one-night thing. One contestant will win the $25,000 then and there, or it will be split among the other five. Yes, even Dancing With The Stars is a "game" played on a television "show", but there's a difference between something like that and Jeopardy! or Family Feud. Ninja Warrior is never referred to anywhere as a "game show." --Bcschneider53 (talk) 12:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
I had a grandiose article written about how Dog Eat Dog wasn't say apart of this project but Double Dare was. It's not so much that Dog Eat Dog is a one-night thing that makes it a game show. (Hell there was a show based on a tournament of quiz champions a while ago where great quizzers competed over multiple nights.)
Looking at it as a whole, yeah Dog Eat Dog should be a part of the project (and is). Yes American Gladiators is a "Game Show" and is listed as such on it's Genre line. But to quote its own page, it's a "competition TV show". That's generally why it's not part of the project. This project is generally for shows which are quizzer based in some shape or form. Dog Eat Dog had a general knowledge question round where as American Gladiators did not and for that it's not a part of this project. However, Gladiators 2000 COULD be considered a game show as that one is literally questions and physical challenges (ala what Double Dare does) in every round. To contrast, Nickelodeon GUTS is NOT a game show since it is a purely competition and objective based game.
The guideline should generally be: Is there a question being asked in the game based on some previous knowledge (Jeopardy, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?, etc.) or some knowledge that is gained during the course of the show (Exit List, Legends of the Hidden Temple, Brainsurge, Idiotest, etc.)? If the answer is no, then it is likely not a game show. If yes but the test involves some form of performance or presentation, then it's likely a competition show. Shows like Ninja Warrior/American Ninja Warrior, do not test knowledge but rather physical prowess. Sure there is a bit of "How would you solve this obstacle?" but the majority of the show and course is "Are you strong enough or able to complete the qualifier and main course?" Ninja Warrior does not ask questions to its participants (outside of interviews about their run and prepartion) so it fails that test. Another test: RuPaul's Drag Race. Does RuPaul test knowledge? Yes, as you would have to have the knowledge of performing. But it fails the test of its a "game show" as its a competition based on performances, not knowledge. You mentioned All American Handyman. Let's put it to the same test. Is this a test of previous knowledge? Yes. You would gain this knowledge via schooling and vocation schools. However, this test is performance based and not general knowledge. This makes All American Handyman a skills competition and not a quiz game show. At the end of the day, when it comes down to it... "You'll know it when you'll see it." With that being said, if we want to "adopt" and modify the scope of this project to include such shows as Ninja Warrior or All American Handyman, we can start discussing that. (After all this project has been semi-dormant until recently.) retched (talk) 15:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Wipeout (2008 U.S. game show) and Hole in the Wall (U.S. game show) are currently part of the project, but they are physical skills competitions, and not a knowledge competition. So that means it should be de-bannered? And game shows like Race to Escape should not be bannered? (or any other maze games); and weird Japanese physical challenge game shows? -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 10:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Okay this is a bit tough. Wipeout's banner SHOULD be removed from the project. Wipeout is purely a challenge-based object, there is no knowledge concept of it. Sure it's played for cash and prizes... but not so much general knowledge. Essentially Wipeout is more like American Gladiators than say Double Dare. Hole in the Wall can stay. The reason being is that each round a question is played against the wall but sometimes that includes answering questions. So Hole in the Wall can generally stay in the project. While it's not consistent as say Double Dare, there is still a concept of "Answer the question, standing in place, and hold still to stay in the area". retched (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Why would a single episode length be considered a cut-off? (as in Dog Eat Dog) Frequently in the 1970s the even knowledge game show "Match Game" split contestant rounds across shows. And Jeopardy! lets players continue until they lose (or previously, 5 night limit) Jeopardy! frequently uses tournament style multi-night contests. -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 10:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

The American Bible Challenge at FAC[edit]

The GSN game show The American Bible Challenge is currently a featured article candidate. Anyone who wants to review the article or give feedback can do so here. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 02:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Miljoenenjacht (Netherlands) listed at Requested moves[edit]

Information.svg

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Miljoenenjacht (Netherlands) to be moved to Miljoenenjacht. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.