Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Congress

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
   MAIN        Talk        To do        Mem        Ord        Dist        Cmtee        Assess        Pop        Bio        Img        WikiList        Cleanup        COTW      
WikiProject U.S. Congress (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

See also:

Tracking recent changes[edit]

Some of the best pages to track are trackable via your favorite RSS or atom reader. See Wikipedia:Syndication.

Recent changes RSS feed atom feed
Recent changes to 110th United States Congress RSS atom
Recent changes to 109th United States Congress RSS atom
Recent changes to United States Congress RSS atom
Recent changes to United States House of Representatives RSS atom
Recent changes to United States Senate RSS atom

Article alerts[edit]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:47, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

109th United States Congress[edit]

I have nominated 109th United States Congress for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

113th Congress and subcommittees[edit]

A friendly reminder to editors to take a second look before creating new subcommittee articles, particularly if committees are proposing renaming or restructring. Existing subcommittee articles should be moved to the new names if possible. The House Oversight Committee is once such committee, and I would propose the following moves to reflect the new subcommittees that were annouced yesterday.

Current Subcommittee New Subcommittee
Federal Workforce, U.S. Postal Service and Labor Policy Federal Workforce, U.S. Postal Service and the Census
Government Organization, Efficiency and Financial Management Government Operations
National Security, Homeland Defense and Foreign Operations National Security
Regulatory Affairs, Stimulus Oversight and Government Spending Economic Growth, Job Creation and Regulatory Affairs
Health Care, District of Columbia, Census and the National Archives Energy Policy, Health Care and Entitlements
TARP, Financial Services and Bailouts of Public and Private Programs Defunct
Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and Procurement Reform Defunct
  • Nice reminder, but Dcmacnut (talk · contribs), please remember to sign your posts. :) II | (t - c) 01:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Kevin McCarthy (California politician)#Requested moves[edit]

Above link leads to discussion as to whether Kevin McCarthy (California politician) should become the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC at the Kevin McCarthy disambiguation page. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 05:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

US Congressional term end dates[edit]

Dear all,

there is a disagreement whether congressional terms end on the 3th or 4th of March. The discussion is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics#US Congressional term end dates. Input is appreciated.

Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 07:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Actually, the disagreement is about the date Congressional terms ended prior to the ratification of the Twentieth Amendment in 1933. Czoal (talk) 23:22, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack[edit]

An article is needed on this historically significant committee. See the Senate archive on this committee. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Use of far right label for Freedom Caucus[edit]

Please take part in a discussion at Talk:Freedom Caucus on whether it is correct to say in Wikipedia's voice that the caucus is a far right organization. Iselilja (talk) 16:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Resignation from the United States Senate[edit]

I have created a new article titled Resignation from the United States Senate. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Almanac of American Politics 2014[edit]

I have a copy of this book on my kindle and am using it to tweak Congressman and Senator articles. Either to add new information or to put in the book as a reference for existing information. Here are two[1] examples[2] of what I have done.

Back when I was younger, I bought these books and had every year from 1984 to 1992 and a few more from the years 1994 to 2004. Over time I gave away or threw out the older copies. Now I wish I still had them....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Additional opinions sought[edit]

on a topic that may be of interest to those editors interested in the use of redirects on a page that disambiguates names of defunct House and Senate committees. See Talk:Committee on Government Operations#Avoid redirects. olderwiser 23:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Trouble finding references? The Wikipedia Library is proud to announce ...[edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg The Wikipedia Library

There are up to 30 free one-year Alexander Street Press (ASP) accounts available to experienced Wikipedians through this partnership. To apply for free access, please go to WP:ASP.

Alexander Street Press is an electronic academic database publisher. Its "Academic Video Online: Premium collection" includes videos in a range of subject areas, including news programs (like 60 minutes) and newsreels, music and theatre, speeches and lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. This collection would be useful for researching topics related to science, engineering, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 22:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Auto-assessment of article classes[edit]

Following a recent discussion at WP:VPR, there is consensus for an opt-in bot task that automatically assesses the class of articles based on classes listed for other project templates on the same page. In other words, if WikiProject A has evaluated an article to be C-class and WikiProject B hasn't evaluated the article at all, such a bot task would automatically evaluate the article as C-class for WikiProject B.

If you think auto-assessment might benefit this project, consider discussing it with other members here. For more information or to request an auto-assessment run, please visit User:BU RoBOT/autoassess. This is a one-time message to alert projects with over 1,000 unassessed articles to this possibility. ~ RobTalk 01:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

font for changes in membership for individual congress pages[edit]

a couple of us noticed the font size varies for the change in membership for both Senate and the House for each congress (i.e. 114th, 113th, etc.). A suggestion has been made to eliminate the 80% font and standardize on 100%. I think there are more congresses at 80% than 100% font. It shouldn't take to long to do either size.....I thought I'd throw it out to see if anyone feels strongly either way........feel free to comment below......Pvmoutside (talk) 12:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  • I'm the other person in the "couple" mentioned above. The 80% was probably used to squeeze more info into the table. But its font-size seems to stick out visually. There are plenty of other places one could possibly argue for a smaller font size, but then the page will look chaotic. Therefore, I suggest moving all text to the default size, with a few tiny exceptions such as dates in the party summary tables (which might be ok at 100% after all), and the specially-created "Leadership" section contents TOCs. —GoldRingChip 14:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I agree. The articles need to be legible and consistent.DCmacnut<> 16:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)