Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject:Alternative Medicine/Classification Systems/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Wikiproject:Alternative Medicine. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
|
Talk:Wikiproject on Alternative Medicine |
|---|
| Talk:Main Project Page |
| Talk:Announcements |
| Talk:Classification Systems |
| Talk:Compliance Audits |
| Talk:Infoboxes |
| Talk:Standards of Quality |
| Project Page |
Unlike most projects, the Wikiproject on alternative medicine contains a large number of different project pages that are designed to organize the data contained in articles about CAM. The infobox on the far right is designed to make it easier to navigate your way through the maze of different project and talk pages contained in this Wikiproject. It is suggested that your exploration of our project should start out on the main project page.
The rules are very simple here.
The rules are very simple here.
- If you want to edit this WikiProject, then we are asking for the simple courtesy of registering yourself as a Public Participant in this WikiProject in the main project page. Most WikiProjects follow this same practice.
- All comments made on our talk pages must be friendly.
- Hostile comments and / or personal attacks are subject to being refactored out by any of our public participants.
- This talk page is reserved exclusively for discussions of the Classification Systems project page.
-- John Gohde, aka Mr-Natural-Health 15:10, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Memo on the Trolls
This WikiProject has encounter resistance from trolls every step of the way. The science people never rallied in a show of support to the classification systems used in our infoboxes, nor to our drive to add evidence to the CAM articles. Since these science people have only demonstrated bigoted, obnoxious, time wasting behavior towards this WikiProject they are clearly more interested in trolling then in improving Wikipedia. Therefore, the decision was made to drop the knowledge classifications from our infoboxes. And, there is no longer a requirement of this WikiProject to add any evidence to any of the CAM articles. -- John Gohde 14:11, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Hey John, just for your information I am generally impressed by the quality of the writing on the CAM pages. I think our manner would be calmer if you didn't try to claim scientifically established topics as alternative. eg inflamation, low back pain, cholesterol fractions, hypertension, palliative care (for heavens sake). Erich 14:27, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- ??? See category:Applied CAM -- John Gohde 15:08, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)