Jump to content

User talk:EyeSerene

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Current Military history WikiProject discussions
  • No major discussions are open at the moment
edit this list

Thank you...

[edit]

to all who've posted messages and left shiny stuff here while I've been on a hugely extended and unplanned wikibreak. I have read and greatly appreciated them all. I have been editing occasionally and quietly as an IP, just because some spelling and grammar can't be overlooked, but I hope to be able to ease back into using this account in a more substantial way (though probably not with the same level of commitment I was able to give in olden times). As an aside, I won't be asking for my admin tools back anytime soon - I have to work out how to do this wikimarkup stuff again first :) ATB, EyeSerenetalk 20:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

[edit]
WELCOME BACK! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers Ed :) Two logins in as many days... Good to see the battleships project is still going! EyeSerenetalk 21:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

[edit]

I am Planning to edit Page Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike to update the jurisdiction and Population of City wards. So I need your valuable suggestion on thisVijeth N Bharadwaj 21:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deathstalker universe for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deathstalker universe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deathstalker universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/XVIII Tranche Project Audit. The Milhist project is undergoing an internal audit, as a former coordinator, I invite to join the process and enhance the Project. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

[edit]
Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PACE Sports Management for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PACE Sports Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PACE Sports Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kleuske (talk) 18:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]