Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Chaetodon melannotus edit.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2010 at 22:36:02 (UTC)

Reason: Encyclopaedic composition taken in the wild. Plenty of resolution and detail.
Articles in which this image appears: Blackback butterflyfish, Chaetodon
FP category for this image: Animals/Fish
Creator: Leonard Low, edit by Papa Lima Whiskey

Support as nominator --Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. Not quite perfect, but the composition is nice and the EV solid. J Milburn (talk) 10:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not! --Citron (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit: ~~Minor weaknesses in the background, but~~ Overall good. Ditto nominator and Milburn. Maedin\^talk 20:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit is a great improvement, addresses the background perfectly. Updated my above vote. Maedin\^talk 13:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Citron. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 14:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am easily impressed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which one? Makeemlighter (talk) 04:06, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Original Shroomydan (talk) 04:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit - white balance preferable. Jujutacular ^talk 04:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support either, unhelpfully. J Milburn (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Edit looks better without the cyan. Nergaal (talk) 23:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't vote earlier, but I'd go for the edit. --Avenue (talk) 08:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't vote earlier either, but I'd go for the edit. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 19:31, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Chaetodon melannotus edit4.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]