Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Rodríguez Villegas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Speedy delete was an option. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Rodríguez Villegas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Biography does not meet WP:BASIC there is no claim of Notability and no in-depth coverage by independent reliable sources. Also it is pretty clear that it is a promotional article, the creator marrovi claimed to be the subject of the BLP himself at his userpage in the Spanish project (see here). He has created the autobiography in various projects in an apparent conflict of interest and cross-wiki spam. Its deletion is also currently under discussion at the ca project (see here), where all current votes are to delete it. I beleive it meets the requirements for Speedy deletion under WP:A7 and WP:G11, but I open this debate since the article has been around since June 2015 and more than one editor has made contributions and as a request by Rosymonterrey following up a debate in the Spanish admin noticeboard (see here). Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Spam cross wiki. It is a serious case of self-promotion and reiterative creation of hoaxes in many Wikipedias, see. In the case of this article in particular, it is the biography of the same user who edits it. As someone said in another similar matter: "Blatantly non-notable. Actually, I'd advocate for a speedy delete, because I don't see even a credible claim of significance".--Rosymonterrey (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is still questionable for an independently notable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.