Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tony85poon/Archive

Tony85poon

Tony85poon (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

14 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Seaweedisgood (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Sealilyisgood (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I blocked Tony85poon earlier today for edit warring on Jimmy Carter. Not long after, the account Seaweedisgood is created, making random sandbox edits, and then making the same sort of edits as Tony was making. WP:DUCK is quacking. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Not only the same types of edits, but in the same articles and the same talk page discussions. R2 (bleep) 04:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mymomisdead (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is another obvious Tony85poon sock. See contributions.- MrX 🖋 11:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Reaper Eternal:, do you mind handling the above account and doing another sweep for sleeper accounts? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Administrator note Added Sealilyisgood (talk · contribs). Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed:

Tony85poon (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Seaweedisgood (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

And switching over to mobile networks so I can't confirm, but I mean look at the names:

Sealilyisgood (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Sealionisgood (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Sealordisgood (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note I've indeffed all the puppets, and extended the master's block to indef for the mass socking. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Ribenderen (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. Interest in the Cory Booker 2020 presidential campaign article. This account made the same 10 sandbox edits made by Tony's other socks (example) to become autoconfirmed. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

(from duplicate report which was removed): newly-registered account reverting to same disruptive activity (see mass-creation of useless redirects) and only notable edit restores an identical quote by the sockmaster to the article (note the accessdate) Mélencron (talk) 11:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk endorsed - Given the result of the last check, please check to identify potential sleepers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Inconclusive – may be on a proxy. It's hard to tell sometimes with this ISP. If not, the geolocation is wrong. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked per WP:DUCK along with User:Hanguoderen and User:Taiguoderen. -DJSasso (talk) 11:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Myauntisdead (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Exact same behavior as described in case above (restoring rote content added by sockmaster, ten sandbox edits) Mélencron (talk) 03:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This one is a lot easier. Confirmed. I tried poking around, but I don't see any others. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]