User talk:Mr. Recycle

styrofoam

good question mr recycle. it appears from the page history that the article was gradually vandalized. unfortunately, when i reverted some particular vandalism, i did not go back far enough. User:Anomie seems to have found the last good version. remember, anyone can edit, so you could have gone ahead and re-added the ban section. if you are not comfortable with that size edit, as of yet, go to the discussion page of the article, and let users know what you are planning to do. that way you can get an idea of how people will respond. welcome, and feel free to hit me up if you have any other questions. the_undertow ^talk 20:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Caw logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Caw logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Caw logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Caw logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Richprentice

This picture has nothing to do with "Environment California". That means it is innapropriate for the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richprentice (talk • contribs) 01:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure why the above user removed your fair use rationale from the CAW logo, as nothing indicated your intention to use it on the Environment California page. I've restored the rationale. Katr67 (talk) 23:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Californians Against Waste

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Californians Against Waste requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 23:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Californians Against Waste for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Californians Against Waste is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Californians Against Waste until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tóraí (talk) 20:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Californians Against Waste (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Californians Against Waste (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)