History of Advaita Vedanta: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
added sources
Line 187: Line 187:


=====Mahatama Gandhi=====
=====Mahatama Gandhi=====
Gandhi declared his allegiance to Advaita Vedānta, and was another popularizing force for its ideas.<ref name=gier40>{{cite book|author=Nicholas F. Gier|title=The Virtue of Nonviolence: From Gautama to Gandhi|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tVLt99uleLwC&pg=PA40|year =2004|publisher= State University of New York Press|isbn=978-0-7914-5949-2|pages=40–42}}</ref> According to Nicholas Gier, this to Gandhi meant the unity of God and humans, that all beings have the same one Self and therefore equality, that ''atman'' exists and is same as everything in the universe, ahimsa (non-violence) is the very nature of this ''atman''.<ref name=gier40/> Gandhi called himself advaitist many times, including his letters, but he believed that others have a right to a viewpoint different than his own because they come from a different background and perspective.<ref name=jordens116/><ref name=long194/> According to Gier, Gandhi did not interpret ''maya'' as illusion, but accepted that "personal theism" leading to "impersonal monism" as two tiers of religiosity.<ref name=gier40/>
Gandhi declared his allegiance to Advaita Vedānta, and was another popularizing force for its ideas.<ref name=gier40>{{cite book|author=Nicholas F. Gier|title=The Virtue of Nonviolence: From Gautama to Gandhi|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tVLt99uleLwC&pg=PA40|year =2004|publisher= State University of New York Press|isbn=978-0-7914-5949-2|pages=40–42}}</ref> According to Nicholas Gier, this to Gandhi meant the unity of God and humans, that all beings have the same one Self and therefore equality, that ''atman'' exists and is same as everything in the universe, ahimsa (non-violence) is the very nature of this ''atman''.<ref name=gier40/> Gandhi called himself advaitist many times, including his letters, but he believed that others have a right to a viewpoint different than his own because they come from a different background and perspective.<ref name=jordens116>{{cite book|author=J. Jordens|title=Gandhi's Religion: A Homespun Shawl|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ELODDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA116|year=1998|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-0-230-37389-1|page=116}}</ref><ref name=long194>{{cite book|author=Jeffrey D. Long|editor=Rita Sherma and Arvind Sharma|title=Hermeneutics and Hindu Thought: Toward a Fusion of Horizons|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x4eXRvwyvtMC&pg=PA194 |year=2008|publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-4020-8192-7|page=194}}</ref> According to Gier, Gandhi did not interpret ''maya'' as illusion, but accepted that "personal theism" leading to "impersonal monism" as two tiers of religiosity.<ref name=gier40/>


===Contemporary Advaita Vedānta===
===Contemporary Advaita Vedānta===

Revision as of 07:46, 5 January 2022

Gaudapada, one of the most important pre-Śaṅkara philosophers in Advaita tradition

Advaita Vedānta is the oldest extant tradition of Vedānta, and one of the six orthodox (āstika) Hindu philosophies (darśana). It's history may be traced back to the start of the Common Era, but takes clear shape in the 6th-7th century CE, with the seminal works of Gaudapada and Shankara, who is considered by tradition and Orientalist Indologists to be the most prominent exponent of the Advaita Vedānta,[1] though the historical fame and cultural influence of Shankara grew only centuries later, particularly during the era of the Muslim invasions and consequent reign of the Indian subcontinent.[2] The living Advaita Vedānta tradition in medieval times was influenced by, and incorporated elements from, the yogic tradition and texts like the Yoga Vasistha and the Bhagavata Purana.[3] In the 19th century, due to the interplay between western views and Indian nationalism, Advaita came to be regarded as the paradigmatic example of Hindu spirituality, despite the numerical dominance of theistic Bkakti-oriented religiosity.[4][5] In modern times, its views appear in various Neo-Vedānta movements.[6]

Historiography

The historiography of Advaita Vedanta is coloured by Orientalist notions,[7] while modern formulations of Advaita Vedānta, which developed as a reaction to western Orientalism and Perennialism[8] have "become a dominant force in Indian intellectual thought."[9]

In the Orientalist view, the medieavl Muslim period was a time of stagnation and cultural degeneration, in which the original purity of the Upanisadic teachings, systematized by philosophers like Shankara, was lost. In this view, "the genuine achievements of Indian civilization" were recovered during the British colonial rule of India, due to the efforts of western Indologists, who viewed Advaita Vedanta as the authentic philosophy of the Upanishads, and Shankara as it's greatest exponent.[7][note 1] While this view has been criticised by postcolonial studies and critiques of Orientalism, "in some corners of the academy, the Orientalists' understanding of premodern Indian history has so far escaped thorough reexamination."[10] According to Michael S. Allen and Anand Venkatkrishnan, "scholars have yet to provide even a rudimentary, let alone comprehensive account of the history of Advaita Vedānta in the centuries leading up to the colonial period."[11]

Pre-Shankara Advaita Vedānta

Of the Vedānta-school before the composition of the Brahma Sutras (400–450 CE[12]), wrote Nakamura in 1950, almost nothing is known.[12] The two Advaita writings of pre-Shankara period, known to scholars such as Nakamura in the first half of 20th-century, were the Vākyapadīya, written by Bhartṛhari (second half 5th century[13]), and the Māndūkya-kārikā written by Gauḍapāda (7th century).[12]

Scholarship after 1950 suggests that almost all Sannyasa Upanishads, which belong to the minor Upanishads and are of a later date than the major Upanishads, namely the first centuries CE,[note 2] and some of which are of a sectarian nature,[18] have a strong Advaita Vedānta outlook.[19][20][21] The Advaita Vedānta views in these ancient texts may be, states Patrick Olivelle, because major Hindu monasteries of this period (early medieaval period, starting mid 6th century) belonged to the Advaita Vedānta tradition, preserving only Advaita views, and recasting other texts into Advaita texts.[19]

Earliest Vedānta – Upanishads and Brahma Sutras

Main article: Brahma Sutras
See also: Vedas, Upanishads, and Darsanas

The Upanishads form the basic texts, of which Vedānta gives an interpretation.[22] The Upanishads do not contain "a rigorous philosophical inquiry identifying the doctrines and formulating the supporting arguments".[23][note 3] This philosophical inquiry was performed by the darsanas, the various philosophical schools.[25][note 4]

Bādarāyana's Brahma Sutras

The Brahma Sutras of Bādarāyana, also called the Vedānta Sutra,[27] were compiled in its present form around 400–450 AD,[28] but "the great part of the Sutra must have been in existence much earlier than that".[28] Estimates of the date of Bādarāyana's lifetime differ between 200 BC and 200 AD.[29]

The Brahma Sutra is a critical study of the teachings of the Upanishads, possibly "written from a Bhedābheda Vedāntic viewpoint."[web 1] It was and is a guide-book for the great teachers of the Vedantic systems.[27] Bādarāyana was not the first person to systematise the teachings of the Upanishads.[30] He refers to seven Vedantic teachers before him:[30]

From the way in which Bādarāyana cites the views of others it is obvious that the teachings of the Upanishads must have been analyzed and interpreted by quite a few before him and that his systematization of them in 555 sutras arranged in four chapters must have been the last attempt, most probably the best.[30]

Between Brahma Sutras and Shankara

According to Nakamura, "there must have been an enormous number of other writings turned out in this period, but unfortunately all of them have been scattered or lost and have not come down to us today".[12] In his commentaries, Shankara mentions 99 different predecessors of his Sampradaya.[31] In the beginning of his commentary on the Brhadaranyaka Upanishad Shankara salutes the teachers of the Brahmavidya Sampradaya.[web 2] Pre-Shankara doctrines and sayings can be traced in the works of the later schools, which does give insight into the development of early Vedānta philosophy.[12]

The names of various important early Vedānta thinkers have been listed in the Siddhitraya by Yamunācārya (c.1050), the Vedārthasamgraha by Rāmānuja (c.1050–1157), and the Yatīndramatadīpikā by Śrīnivāsa-dāsa.[12] Combined,[12] at least fourteen thinkers are known to have existed between the composition of the Brahman Sutras and Shankara's lifetime.[12][note 5]

Although Shankara is often considered to be the founder of the Advaita Vedānta school, according to Nakamura, comparison of the known teachings of these early Vedantins and Shankara's thought shows that most of the characteristics of Shankara's thought "were advocated by someone before Śankara".[32] Shankara "was the person who synthesized the Advaita-vāda which had previously existed before him".[32] In this synthesis, he was the rejuvenator and defender of ancient learning.[33] He was an unequalled commentator,[33] due to whose efforts and contributions the Advaita Vedānta assumed a dominant position within Indian philosophy.[33]

Gauḍapāda and Māṇḍukya Kārikā

Main article: Gaudapada

Gauḍapāda (6th century)[34] was the teacher of Govinda Bhagavatpada and the grandteacher of Shankara. Gauḍapāda uses the concepts of Ajātivāda and Maya[35] to establish "that from the level of ultimate truth the world is a cosmic illusion,"[36] and "suggests that the whole of our waking experience is exactly the same as an illusory and insubstantial dream."[37] In contrast, Adi Shankara insists upon a distinction between waking experience and dreams.[37]

Mandukya Karika

Gauḍapāda wrote or compiled[38] the Māṇḍukya Kārikā, also known as the Gauḍapāda Kārikā or the Āgama Śāstra.[39] The Māṇḍukya Kārikā is a commentary in verse form on the Māṇḍūkya Upanishad, one of the shortest Upanishads consisting of just 13 prose sentences. Of the ancient literature related to Advaita Vedānta, the oldest surviving complete text is the Māṇḍukya Kārikā.[40] Many other texts with the same type of teachings and which were older than Māṇḍukya Kārikā existed and this is unquestionable because other scholars and their views are cited by Gauḍapāda, Shankara and Anandagiri, according to Hajime Nakamura.[41] Gauḍapāda relied particularly on the Māṇḍūkya Upanishad, as well as the Brihadaranyaka and Chandogya Upanishads.[40]

The Māṇḍūkya Upanishad was considered to be a Śruti before the era of Adi Shankara, but not treated as particularly important.[39] In later post-Shankara period its value became far more important, and regarded as expressing the essence of the Upanishad philosophy. The entire Karika became a key text for the Advaita school in this later era.[42][note 6]

Shri Gauḍapādacharya Math

Main article: Shri Gaudapadacharya Math

Around 740 CE Gauḍapāda founded Shri Gauḍapādacharya Math[note 7], also known as Kavaḷē maṭha. It is located in Kavale, Ponda, Goa,[web 3] and is the oldest matha of the South Indian Saraswat Brahmins.[45][web 4]

Adi Shankara

20th verse of Brahmajnanavalimala, attributed to Adi Shankara:
ब्रह्म सत्यं जगन्मिथ्या
जीवो ब्रह्मैव नापरः

Brahman is real, the world is an illusion
Brahman and Jiva are not different.

Brahmajnanavalimala 1.20[46]

Main article: Adi Shankara

Advaita Vedānta existed prior to Adi Shankara (788–820), also known as Śaṅkara Bhagavatpādācārya and Ādi Śaṅkarācārya, but found in him its most influential expounder.[47] According to Mayeda, Shankara represents a turning point in the development of Vedānta,[48] yet he also notices that it is only since Deussens's praise that Shankara "has usually been regarded as the greatest philosopher of India."[49] Mayeda further notes that Shankara was primarily concerned with moksha, "and not with the establishment of a complete system of philosophy or theology,"[49] following Potter, who qualifies Shankara as a "speculative philosopher."[50] According to Nakamura, after the growing influence of Buddhism on Vedānta, culminating in the works of Gauḍapāda, Adi Shankara gave a Vedantic character to the Buddhistic elements in these works,[48] synthesising and rejuvenating the doctrine of Advaita.[33] According to Koller, using ideas in ancient Indian texts, Shankara systematized the foundation for Advaita Vedānta in the 8th century, reforming Badarayana's Vedānta tradition.[51]

Historical context

See also: Late-Classical Age and Hinduism Middle Ages

Shankara lived in the time of the so-called "Late classical Hinduism",[52] which lasted from 650 to 1100 .[52] This era was one of political instability that followed Gupta dynasty and King Harsha of the 7th century .[53] It was a time of social and cultural change as the ideas of Buddhism, Jainism, and various traditions within Hinduism were competing for members.[54][55] Buddhism in particular influenced India's spiritual traditions in the first 700 years of the 1st millennium AD.[53][56] Shankara and his contemporaries made a significant contribution in understanding Buddhism and the ancient Vedic traditions; they then incorporated the extant ideas, particularly reforming the Vedānta tradition of Hinduism, making it India's most important tradition for more than a thousand years.[53]

Writings

Main article: Adi Shankara bibliography

Adi Shankara is best known for his reviews and commentaries (Bhasyas) on ancient Indian texts. Shankara's masterpiece of commentary is the Brahmasutrabhasya (literally, commentary on Brahma Sutra), a fundamental text of the Vedānta school of Hinduism.[57] His commentaries on ten Mukhya (principal) Upanishads are also considered authentic by scholars.[57][58] Other authentic works of Shankara include commentaries on the Bhagavad Gitā (part of his Prasthana Trayi Bhasya).[59]

Shankara's Vivarana (tertiary notes) on the commentary by Vedavyasa on Yogasutras as well as those on Apastamba Dharma-sũtras (Adhyatama-patala-bhasya) are accepted by scholars as authentic works of Adi Shankara.[60][61] Among the Stotra (poetic works), the Daksinamurti Stotra, Bhajagovinda Stotra, Sivanandalahari, Carpata-panjarika, Visnu-satpadi, Harimide, Dasa-shloki, and Krishna-staka are likely to be authentic.[60][62] He also authored Upadesasahasri, his most important original philosophical work.[51][61] Of other original Prakaranas (प्रकरण, monographs, treatise), 76 works are attributed to Adi Shankara. Modern era Indian scholars Belvalkar and Upadhyaya accept five and thirty nine works, respectively, as authentic.[63]

Several commentaries on Nrisimha-Purvatatapaniya and Shveshvatara Upanishads have been attributed to Adi Shankara, but their authenticity is highly doubtful.[58][64] Similarly, commentaries on several early and later Upanishads attributed to Shankara are rejected by scholars[65] as his works, and are likely works of later Advaita Vedānta scholars; these include the Kaushitaki Upanishad, Maitri Upanishad, Kaivalya Upanishad, Paramahamsa Upanishad, Sakatayana Upanishad, Mandala Brahmana Upanishad, Maha Narayana Upanishad, and Gopalatapaniya Upanishad.[64]

The authenticity of Shankara being the author of Vivekacūḍāmaṇi[66] has been questioned, and "modern scholars tend to reject its authenticity as a work by Shankara."[67] The authorship of Shankara of his Mandukya Upanishad Bhasya and his supplementary commentary on Gaudapada's Māṇḍukya Kārikā has been disputed by Nakamura.[68] However, other scholars state that the commentary on Mandukya, which is actually a commentary on Madukya-Karikas by Gaudapada, may be authentic.[60][64]

Influence of Shankara

Shankara's status in the tradition of Advaita Vedānta is unparallelled. He travelled all over India to help restore the study of the Vedas.[69] His teachings and tradition form the basis of Smartism and have influenced Sant Mat lineages.[70] He introduced the Pañcāyatana form of worship, the simultaneous worship of five deities – Ganesha, Surya, Vishnu, Shiva, and Devi. Shankara explained that all deities were but different forms of the one Brahman, the invisible Supreme Being.[71]

Benedict Ashley credits Adi Shankara for unifying two seemingly disparate philosophical doctrines in Hinduism, namely Atman and Brahman.[72] Isaeva states that Shankara's influence extended to reforming Hinduism, founding monasteries, edifying disciples, disputing opponents, and engaging in philosophic activity that, in the eyes of Indian tradition, helped revive "the orthodox idea of the unity of all beings" and Vedānta thought.[73]

Some scholars doubt Shankara's early influence in India.[74] According to King and Roodurmun, until the 10th century Shankara was overshadowed by his older contemporary Mandana-Misra, who was considered to be the major representative of Advaita.[75][76] Other scholars state that the historical records for this period are unclear, and little reliable information is known about the various contemporaries and disciples of Shankara.[77]

Several scholars suggest that the historical fame and cultural influence of Shankara grew centuries later, particularly during the era of the Muslim invasions and consequent devastation of India.[74][78] Many of Shankara's biographies were created and published in and after the 14th century, such as the widely cited Vidyaranya's Śankara-vijaya. Vidyaranya, also known as Madhava, who was the 12th Jagadguru of the Śringeri Śarada Pītham from 1380 to 1386,[79] inspired the re-creation of the Hindu Vijayanagara Empire of South India in response to the devastation caused by the Islamic Delhi Sultanate.[78][80] He and his brothers, suggest Paul Hacker and other scholars,[74][78] wrote about Śankara as well as extensive Advaitic commentaries on the Vedas and Dharma. Vidyaranya was a minister in the Vijayanagara Empire and enjoyed royal support,[80] and his sponsorship and methodical efforts helped establish Shankara as a rallying symbol of values, spread historical and cultural influence of Shankara's Vedānta philosophies, and establish monasteries (mathas) to expand the cultural influence of Shankara and Advaita Vedānta.[74]

Post-Shankara – early medieval times

Sureśvara and Maṇḍana Miśra

Main articles: Sureśvara and Maṇḍana Miśra

Sureśvara (fl. 800–900 CE)[81] and Maṇḍana Miśra were contemporaries of Shankara, Sureśvara often (incorrectly) being identified with Maṇḍana Miśra.[82] Both explained Sankara "on the basis of their personal convictions".[82] Sureśvara has also been credited as the founder of a pre-Shankara branch of Advaita Vedānta.[81]

Maṇḍana Miśra was a Mimamsa scholar and a follower of Kumarila, but also wrote a seminal text on Advaita that has survived into the modern era, the Brahma-siddhi.[83][84] According to tradition, Maṇḍana Miśra and his wife were defeated by Shankara in a debate, after which he became a follower of Shankara.[83] Yet, his attitude toward Shankara was that of a "self-confident rival teacher of Advaita",[85] and his influence was such that some regard the Brahma-siddhi to have "set forth a non-Shankaran brand of Advaita""[83] The "theory of error" set forth in this work became the normative Advaita Vedānta theory of error.[86] It was Vachaspati Misra's commentary on this work that linked it to Shankara's teaching.[87] His influential thesis in the Advaita tradition has been that errors are opportunities because they "lead to truth", and full correct knowledge requires that not only should one understand the truth but also examine and understand errors as well as what is not truth.[88]

Hiriyanna and Kuppuswami Sastra have pointed out that Sureśvara and Maṇḍana Miśra had different views on various doctrinal points:[89]

  • The locus of avidya:[89] according to Maṇḍana Miśra, the individual jiva is the locus of avidya, whereas Suresvara contends that the avidya regarding Brahman is located in Brahman.[89] These two different stances are also reflected in the opposing positions of the Bhamati school and the Vivarana school.[89]
  • Liberation: according to Maṇḍana Miśra, the knowledge that arises from the Mahavakya is insufficient for liberation. Only the direct realization of Brahma is liberating, which can only be attained by meditation.[90] According to Suresvara, this knowledge is directly liberating, while meditation is at best a useful aid.[85][note 8]

Advaita Vedānta sub-schools

After Shankara's death, several sub-schools developed. Two of them still exist today, the Bhāmatī and the Vivarana.[web 5][31] Two defunct schools are the Pancapadika and Istasiddhi, which were replaced by Prakasatman's Vivarana school.[92]

These schools worked out the logical implications of various Advaita doctrines. Two of the problems they encountered were the further interpretations of the concepts of māyā and avidya.[web 5]

Padmapada – Pancapadika school

Padmapada (c. 800 CE)[93] was a direct disciple of Shankara who wrote the Pancapadika, a commentary on the Sankara-bhaya.[93] Padmapada diverged from Shankara in his description of avidya, designating prakrti as avidya or ajnana.[94]

Vachaspati Misra – Bhamati school
Main articles: Bhamati and Vācaspati Miśra

Vachaspati Misra (800–900 CE)[95] wrote the Brahmatattva-samiksa, a commentary on Maṇḍana Miśra's Brahma-siddhi, which provides the link between Mandana Misra and Shankara[87] and attempts to harmonise Shankara's thought with that of Mandana Misra.[web 5] According to Advaita tradition, Shankara reincarnated as Vachaspati Misra "to popularise the Advaita System through his Bhamati".[95] Only two works are known of Vachaspati Misra, the Brahmatattva-samiksa on Maṇḍana Miśra's Brahma-siddhi, and his Bhamati on the Sankara-bhasya, Shankara's commentary on the Brahma-sutras.[87] The name of the Bhamati sub-school is derived from this Bhamati.[web 5]

The Bhamati school takes an ontological approach. It sees the Jiva as the source of avidya.[web 5] It sees meditation as the main factor in the acquirement of liberation, while the study of the Vedas and reflection are additional factors.[96]

Prakasatman – Vivarana school
Main article: Vivarana

Prakasatman (c. 1200–1300)[92] wrote the Pancapadika-Vivarana, a commentary on the Pancapadika by Padmapadacharya.[92] The Vivarana lends its name to the subsequent school. According to Roodurmum, "[H]is line of thought [...] became the leitmotif of all subsequent developments in the evolution of the Advaita tradition."[92]

The Vivarana school takes an epistemological approach. Prakasatman was the first to propound the theory of mulavidya or maya as being of "positive beginningless nature",[97] and sees Brahman as the source of avidya. Critics object that Brahman is pure consciousness, so it cannot be the source of avidya. Another problem is that contradictory qualities, namely knowledge and ignorance, are attributed to Brahman.[web 5]

Vimuktatman – Ista-Siddhi

Vimuktatman (c. 1200 CE)[98] wrote the Ista-siddhi.[98] It is one of the four traditional siddhi, together with Mandana's Brahma-siddhi, Suresvara's Naiskarmya-siddhi, and Madusudana's Advaita-siddhi.[99] According to Vimuktatman, absolute Reality is "pure intuitive consciousness".[100] His school of thought was eventually replaced by Prakasatman's Vivarana school.[92]

Late medieval times (Islamic rule of India) – "Greater Advaita Vedānta"

Michael S. Allen and Anand Venkatkrishnan note that Shankara is very well-studies, but "scholars have yet to provide even a rudimentary, let alone comprehensive account of the history of Advaita Vedānta in the centuries leading up to the colonial period."[11]

Prominent teachers

See also: Dashanami Sampradaya and List of teachers of Advaita Vedanta

According to Sangeetha Menon, prominent names in the later Advaita tradition are:[web 6]

  • Prakāsātman, Vimuktātman, Sarvajñātman (10th century)(see above)
  • Śrī Harṣa, Citsukha (12th century)
  • ānandagiri, Amalānandā (13th century)
  • Vidyāraņya, Śaṅkarānandā (14th century)
  • Sadānandā (15th century)
  • Prakāṣānanda, Nṛsiṁhāśrama (16th century)
  • Madhusūdhana Sarasvati, Dharmarāja Advarindra, Appaya Dīkśita (17th century)

Influence of yogic tradition

While indologists like Paul Hacker and Wilhelm Halbfass took Shankara's system as the measure for an "orthodox" Advaita Vedānta, the living Advaita Vedānta tradition in medieval times was influenced by, and incorporated elements from, the yogic tradition and texts like the Yoga Vasistha and the Bhagavata Purana.[3] The Yoga Vasistha became an authoritative source text in the Advaita vedānta tradition in the 14th century, while Vidyāraņya's Jivanmuktiviveka (14th century) was influenced by the (Laghu-)Yoga-Vasistha, which in turn was influenced by Kashmir Shaivism.[101] Vivekananda's 19th century emphasis on nirvikalpa samadhi was preceded by medieval yogic influences on Advaita Vedānta. In the 16th and 17th centuries, some Nath and hatha yoga texts also came within the scope of the developing Advaita Vedānta tradition.[102]

Development of central position

Main article: Neo-Vedanta
Highest Indian philosophy

Already in medieval times, Advaita Vedānta came to be regarded as the highest of the Indian religious philosophies,[103] a development which was reinforced in modern times due to western interest in Advaita Vedānta, and the subsequent influence of western perceptions of Hinduism.[6]

In contrast, King states that its present position was a response of Hindu intellectuals to centuries of Christian polemic aimed at establishing a "Hindu inferiority complex" during the colonial rule of the Indian subcontinent.[104] The "humanistic, inclusivist" formulation, now called Neo-Vedānta, attempted to respond to this colonial stereotyping of "Indian culture was backward, superstitious and inferior to the West", states King. Advaita Vedānta was projected as the central philosophy of Hinduism, and Neo-Vedānta subsumed and incorporated Buddhist ideas thereby making the Buddha a part of the Vedānta tradition, all in an attempt to reposition the history of Indian culture. Thus, states King, neo-Vedānta developed as a reaction to western Orientalism and Perennialism.[8] With the efforts of Vivekananda, modern formulations of Advaita Vedānta have "become a dominant force in Indian intellectual thought", though Hindu beliefs and practices are diverse.[9]

Unifying Hinduism
Main article: Unifying Hinduism

Advaita Vedānta came to occupy a central position in the classification of various Hindu traditions. To some scholars, it is with the arrival of Islamic rule, first in the form of Delhi Sultanate and later the Mughal Empire, and the subsequent persecution of Indian religions, Hindu scholars began a self-conscious attempts to define an identity and unity.[105][106] Between the twelfth and the fourteenth century, according to Andrew Nicholson, this effort emerged with a classification of astika and nastika systems of Indian philosophies.[105] Certain thinkers, according to Nicholson, began to retrospectively classify ancient thought into "six systems" (saddarsana) of mainstream Hindu philosophy.[107]

Other scholars, acknowledges Nicholson, present an alternate thesis. The scriptures such as the Vedas, Upanishads and Bhagavad Gitā, texts such as Dharmasutras and Puranas, and various ideas that are considered to be paradigmatic Hinduism are traceable to being thousands of years old. Unlike Christianity and Islam, Hinduism as a religion does not have a single founder, rather it is a fusion of diverse scholarship where a galaxy of thinkers openly challenged each other's teachings and offered their own ideas.[107] The term "Hindu" too, states Arvind Sharma, appears in much older texts such as those in Arabic that record the Islamic invasion or regional rule of the Indian subcontinent. Some of these texts have been dated to between the 8th and the 11th century.[108] Within these doxologies and records, Advaita Vedānta was given the highest position, since it was regarded to be the most inclusive system.[109]

Modern times (colonial rule and independence)

According to Sangeetha Menon, Sadaśiva Brahmendra was a prominent 18th century Advaita Vedantin.[web 6]

Influence on Hindu nationalism

Main article: Hindu nationalism

According to King, with the consolidation of the British imperialist rule the new rulers started to view Indians through the "colonially crafted lenses" of Orientalism. In response Hindu nationalism emerged, striving for socio-political independence and countering the influence of Christian missionaries.[110] In this colonial era search of identity Vedānta came to be regarded, both by westerners as by Indian nationalists, as the essence of Hinduism, and Advaita Vedānta came to be regarded as "then paradigmatic example of the mystical nature of the Hindu religion" and umbrella of "inclusivism".[111] This view on Advaita Vedānta, according to King, "provided an opportunity for the construction of a nationalist ideology that could unite Hindus in their struggle against colonial oppression".[112]

Among the colonial era intelligentsia, according to Anshuman Mondal, a professor of Literature specializing in post-colonial studies, the monistic Advaita Vedānta has been a major ideological force for Hindu nationalism. Mahatma Gandhi professed monism of Advaita Vedānta, though at times he also spoke with terms from mind-body dualism schools of Hinduism.[113] Other colonial era Indian thinkers, such as Vivekananda, presented Advaita Vedānta as an inclusive universal religion, a spirituality that in part helped organize a religiously infused identity, and the rise of Hindu nationalism as a counter weight to Islam-infused Muslim communitarian organizations such as the Muslim League, to Christianity-infused colonial orientalism and to religious persecution of those belonging to Indian religions.[114][106][115]

Swami Vivekananda
Main articles: Swami Vivekananda and Ramakrishna Mission

A major proponent in the popularisation of this Universalist and Perennialist interpretation of Advaita Vedānta was Swami Vivekananda,[116] who played a major role in the revival of Hinduism,[117] and the spread of Advaita Vedānta to the west via the Ramakrishna Mission. His interpretation of Advaita Vedānta has been called "Neo-Vedānta". Vivekananda discerned a universal religion, regarding all the apparent differences between various traditions as various manifestations of one truth.[118] He presented karma, bhakti, jnana and raja yoga as equal means to attain moksha,[119] to present Vedānta as a liberal and universal religion, in contrast to the exclusivism of other religions.[119]

Vivekananda emphasised nirvikalpa samadhi as the spiritual goal of Vedānta, he equated it to the liberation in Yoga and encouraged Yoga practice he called Raja yoga.[120] This approach, however, is missing in historic Advaita texts.[121] In 1896, Vivekananda claimed that Advaita appeals to modern scientists:

I may make bold to say that the only religion which agrees with, and even goes a little further than modern researchers, both on physical and moral lines is the Advaita, and that is why it appeals to modern scientists so much. They find that the old dualistic theories are not enough for them, do not satisfy their necessities. A man must have not only faith, but intellectual faith too".[web 7]

According to Rambachan, Vivekananda interprets anubhava as to mean "personal experience", akin to religious experience, whereas Shankara used the term to denote liberating understanding of the sruti.[122][123][124]

Vivekananda's claims about spirituality as "science" and modern, according to David Miller, may be questioned by well informed scientists, but it drew attention for being very different than how Christianity and Islam were being viewed by scientists and sociologists of his era.[125]

Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan
Main article: Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan

Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, first a professor at Oxford University and later a President of India, further popularized Advaita Vedānta, presenting it as the essence of Hinduism.[web 8] According to Michael Hawley, a professor of Religious Studies, Radhakrishnan saw other religions, as well as "what Radhakrishnan understands as lower forms of Hinduism," as interpretations of Advaita Vedānta, thereby "in a sense Hindusizing all religions".[web 8] To him, the world faces a religious problem, where there is unreflective dogmatism and exclusivism, creating a need for "experiential religion" and "inclusivism". Advaita Vedānta, claimed Radhakrishnan, best exemplifies a Hindu philosophical, theological, and literary tradition that fulfills this need.[web 8][126][127] Radhakrishnan did not emphasize the differences between Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism versus Hinduism that he defined in terms of Advaita Vedānta, rather he tended to minimize their differences. This is apparent, for example, in his discussions of Buddhist "Madhyamika and Yogacara" traditions versus the Advaita Vedānta tradition.[127]

Radhakrishnan metaphysics was grounded in Advaita Vedānta, but he reinterpreted Advaita Vedānta for contemporary needs and context.[web 8] He acknowledged the reality and diversity of the world of experience, which he saw as grounded in and supported by the transcendent metaphysical absolute concept (nirguna Brahman).[web 8][note 9] Radhakrishnan also reinterpreted Shankara's notion of maya. According to Radhakrishnan, maya is not a strict absolute idealism, but "a subjective misperception of the world as ultimately real."[web 8][129]

Mahatama Gandhi

Gandhi declared his allegiance to Advaita Vedānta, and was another popularizing force for its ideas.[130] According to Nicholas Gier, this to Gandhi meant the unity of God and humans, that all beings have the same one Self and therefore equality, that atman exists and is same as everything in the universe, ahimsa (non-violence) is the very nature of this atman.[130] Gandhi called himself advaitist many times, including his letters, but he believed that others have a right to a viewpoint different than his own because they come from a different background and perspective.[131][132] According to Gier, Gandhi did not interpret maya as illusion, but accepted that "personal theism" leading to "impersonal monism" as two tiers of religiosity.[130]

Contemporary Advaita Vedānta

Contemporary teachers are the orthodox Jagadguru of Sringeri Sharada Peetham; the more traditional teachers Sivananda Saraswati (1887–1963), Chinmayananda Saraswati (1916-1993),[web 9] Dayananda Saraswati (Arsha Vidya) (1930-2015), Swami Paramarthananda, Swami Tattvavidananda Sarasvati, Carol Whitfield (Radha), Sri Vasudevacharya (previously Michael Comans) [web 9] and less traditional teachers such as Narayana Guru.[web 9] According to Sangeetha Menon, prominent names in 20th century Advaita tradition are Shri Chandrashekhara Bharati Mahaswami, Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Swamigal, Sacchidānandendra Saraswati.[web 6]

Influence on New religious movements

Neo-Advaita
Main article: Neo-Advaita

Neo-Advaita is a New Religious Movement based on a popularised, western interpretation of Advaita Vedānta and the teachings of Ramana Maharshi.[133] Neo-Advaita is being criticised[134][note 10][135][note 11][note 12] for discarding the traditional prerequisites of knowledge of the scriptures[137] and "renunciation as necessary preparation for the path of jnana-yoga".[137][138] Notable neo-advaita teachers are H. W. L. Poonja,[139][133] his students Gangaji[140] Andrew Cohen[note 13], and Eckhart Tolle.[133]

Non-dualism
Main article: Nondualism

Advaita Vedānta has gained attention in western spirituality and New Age, where various traditions are seen as driven by the same non-dual experience.[142] Nonduality points to "a primordial, natural awareness without subject or object".[web 14] It is also used to refer to interconnectedness, "the sense that all things are interconnected and not separate, while at the same time all things retain their individuality".[web 15]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ See also Devdutt Pattanaik (august 30, 2020), Who is a Hindu? - What they don’t tell you about Advaita, Mumbai Mirror.
  2. ^ According to Sprockhoff, the group of older Sannyasa Upanishads – Aruni, Kundika, Kathashruti, Paramahamsa, Jabala and Brahma – were composed before the 3rd-century CE, likely in the centuries before or after the start of the common era,[14] while the Asrama Upanishad is dated to the 3rd-century.[15][16] Olivelle disagrees with Sprockhoff, dating the group of oldest Sannyasa Upanishads to the first centuries of the common era.[17]
  3. ^ Nevertheless, Balasubramanian argues that since the basic ideas of the Vedanta systems are derived from the Vedas, the Vedantic philosophy is as old as the Vedas.[24]
  4. ^ Deutsch and Dalvi point out that, in the Indian context, texts "are only part of a tradition which is preserved in its purest form in the oral transmission as it has been going on".[26]
  5. ^ Bhartŗhari (c.450–500), Upavarsa (c.450–500), Bodhāyana (c.500), Tanka (Brahmānandin) (c.500–550), Dravida (c.550), Bhartŗprapañca (c.550), Śabarasvāmin (c.550), Bhartŗmitra (c.550–600), Śrivatsānka (c.600), Sundarapāndya (c.600), Brahmadatta (c.600–700), Gaudapada (c.640–690), Govinda (c.670–720), Mandanamiśra (c.670–750).[12]
  6. ^ Nakamura notes that there are contradictions in doctrine between the four chapters.[38] According to Murti, the conclusion from Mandukya Karika is so irresistible that Gaudapada is attempting an advaitic interpretation of Vedanta school of Hinduism in the light of the Madhyamika and Yogcara doctrines of Buddhism.[43] However, adds Murti, the doctrines are unlike Buddhism. The first three chapters of the Karika are founded on the Upanishads, with little Buddhist flavor.[43] Chapter Four is unlike the first three, and shows Buddhist terms and influence.[44] Further, according to Murti, and Richard King, no Vedanta scholars who followed Gaudapada ever quoted from Chapter Four of Karika, they only quote from the first three.[43][44]
  7. ^ Sanskrit: श्री संस्थान गौडपदाचार्य मठ, Śrī Sansthāna Gauḍapadācārya Maṭha
  8. ^ According to both Roodurum and Isaeva, Sureśvara stated that mere knowledge of the identity of Jiva and Brahman is not enough for liberation, which requires prolonged meditation on this identity.[81][91]
  9. ^ Neo-Vedanta seems to be closer to Bhedabheda-Vedanta than to Shankara's Advaita Vedanta, with the acknowledgement of the reality of the world. Nicholas F. Gier: "Ramakrsna, Svami Vivekananda, and Aurobindo (I also include M.K. Gandhi) have been labeled "neo-Vedantists," a philosophy that rejects the Advaitins' claim that the world is illusory. Aurobindo, in his The Life Divine, declares that he has moved from Sankara's "universal illusionism" to his own "universal realism" (2005: 432), defined as metaphysical realism in the European philosophical sense of the term."[128]
  10. ^ Marek: "Wobei der Begriff Neo-Advaita darauf hinweist, dass sich die traditionelle Advaita von dieser Strömung zunehmend distanziert, da sie die Bedeutung der übenden Vorbereitung nach wie vor als unumgänglich ansieht. (The term Neo-Advaita indicating that the traditional Advaita increasingly distances itself from this movement, as they regard preparational practicing still as inevitable)[134]
  11. ^ Alan Jacobs: Many firm devotees of Sri Ramana Maharshi now rightly term this western phenomenon as 'Neo-Advaita'. The term is carefully selected because 'neo' means 'a new or revived form'. And this new form is not the Classical Advaita which we understand to have been taught by both of the Great Self Realised Sages, Adi Shankara and Ramana Maharshi. It can even be termed 'pseudo' because, by presenting the teaching in a highly attenuated form, it might be described as purporting to be Advaita, but not in effect actually being so, in the fullest sense of the word. In this watering down of the essential truths in a palatable style made acceptable and attractive to the contemporary western mind, their teaching is misleading.[135]
  12. ^ See for other examples Conway [web 10] and Swartz[136]
  13. ^ Presently Cohen has distanced himself from Poonja, and calls his teachings "Evolutionary Enlightenment".[141] What Is Enlightenment, the magazine published by Choen's organisation, has been critical of neo-Advaita several times, as early as 2001. See.[web 11][web 12][web 13]

References

  1. ^ Olivelle 1992, pp. x–xi, 8–10, 17–18; Phillips 1998, p. 332, note 68; Nakamura 1950, pp. 221, 680; Madaio 2017
  2. ^ Hacker 1995, pp. 29–30; Blake Michael 1992, pp. 60–62 with notes 6, 7 and 8; King 2002, p. 128; Roodurmum 2002, pp. 33–34
  3. ^ a b Madaio 2017, pp. 4–5.
  4. ^ Sharma 2006, p. 38–43, 68–75.
  5. ^ King 2013, p. 128–132.
  6. ^ a b King 2002, pp. 119–133.
  7. ^ a b Nicholson 2010, p. 24-25.
  8. ^ a b King 2002, pp. 136–138, 141–142.
  9. ^ a b King 2002, p. 135.
  10. ^ Nicholson 2010, p. 24.
  11. ^ a b Allen & Venkatkrishnan 2017.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i Nakamura 1950, p. 3.
  13. ^ Nakamura 1950, p. 426.
  14. ^ Olivelle 1992, pp. 8–9.
  15. ^ Olivelle 1992, p. 9.
  16. ^ Sprockhoff, Joachim F (1976). Samnyasa: Quellenstudien zur Askese im Hinduismus (in German). Wiesbaden: Kommissionsverlag Franz Steiner. pp. 277–294, 319–377. ISBN 978-3515019057.
  17. ^ Olivelle 1992, p. 10.
  18. ^ Olivelle 1992, pp. 3–4.
  19. ^ a b Olivelle 1992, pp. 17–18.
  20. ^ Stephen H Phillips (1995), Classical Indian Metaphysics, Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0812692983, p. 332 with note 68
  21. ^ Antonio Rigopoulos (1998), Dattatreya: The Immortal Guru, Yogin, and Avatara, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791436967, pp. 62–63
  22. ^ Deutsch & Dalvi 2004, pp. 95–96.
  23. ^ Balasubramanian 2000, p. xxx.
  24. ^ Balasubramanian 2000, p. xxix.
  25. ^ Balasubramanian 2000, pp. xxx–xxxi.
  26. ^ Deutsch & Dalvi 2004, p. 95.
  27. ^ a b Balasubramanian 2000, p. xxxii.
  28. ^ a b Nakamura 1950a, p. 436.
  29. ^ Pandey 2000, p. 4.
  30. ^ a b c Balasubramanian 2000, p. xxxiii.
  31. ^ a b Roodurmum 2002.
  32. ^ a b Nakamura 1950, p. 678.
  33. ^ a b c d Nakamura 1950, p. 679.
  34. ^ Raju 1992, p. 177.
  35. ^ Comans 2000, pp. 27–33.
  36. ^ Comans 2000, p. 94.
  37. ^ a b Deutsch & Dalvi 2004, p. 157.
  38. ^ a b Nakamura 1950, p. 308.
  39. ^ a b Nakamura 1950, p. 280.
  40. ^ a b Sharma 1997, p. 239.
  41. ^ Nakamura 1950, pp. 211–213.
  42. ^ Nakamura 1950, pp. 280–281.
  43. ^ a b c TRV Murti (1955), The central philosophy of Buddhism, Routledge (2008 Reprint), ISBN 978-0-415-46118-4, pp. 114–115
  44. ^ a b Gaudapada, Devanathan Jagannathan, University of Toronto, IEP
  45. ^ Shri Gowdapadacharya & Shri Kavale Math (A Commemoration volume). p. 10.
  46. ^ Sanskrit:Sanskrit documents, Brahmajnanalimala 1.20
  47. ^ Grimes 1990, p. 7.
  48. ^ a b Mayeda 2006, p. 13.
  49. ^ a b Mayeda 1992, p. XV.
  50. ^ Mayeda 1992, p. XVIII, note 3.
  51. ^ a b John Koller (2007), in Chad Meister and Paul Copan (Editors): The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-134-18001-1, pp. 98–106
  52. ^ a b Michaels 2004, pp. 41–43.
  53. ^ a b c John Koller (2012), Shankara in Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Editors: Chad Meister, Paul Copan), Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-78294-4, pp. 99–108
  54. ^ TMP Mahadevan (1968), Shankaracharya, National Book Trust, pp. 283–285, OCLC 254278306
  55. ^ Frank Whaling (1979), Sankara and Buddhism, Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1–42
  56. ^ Karl Potter (1998), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Advaita Vedānta up to Śaṃkara and his pupils, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0310-7, pp. 1–21, 103–119
  57. ^ a b Mayeda 2006, pp. 6–7.
  58. ^ a b Paul Hacker, Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedanta (Editor: Wilhelm Halbfass), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-2582-4, pp. 30–31
  59. ^ A Rambachan (1991), Accomplishing the Accomplished: Vedas as a Source of Valid Knowledge in Sankara, University of Hawaii Press, ISBN 978-0-8248-1358-1, pp. xii–xiii
  60. ^ a b c Isaeva 1993, pp. 93–97.
  61. ^ a b Wilhelm Halbfass (1990), Tradition and Reflection: Explorations in Indian Thought, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-0362-4, pp. 205–208
  62. ^ Pande 1994, pp. 351–352.
  63. ^ Pande 1994, pp. 113–115.
  64. ^ a b c Pande 1994, pp. 105–113.
  65. ^ Paul Hacker, 'Sankaracarya and Sankarabhagavatpada: Preliminary Remarks Concerning the Authorship Problem', in Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedanta (Editor: Wilhelm Halbfass), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-2582-4, pp. 41–56
  66. ^ Adi Shankaracharya, Vivekacūḍāmaṇi S Madhavananda (Translator), Advaita Ashrama (1921)
  67. ^ John Grimes (2004), The Vivekacudamani of Sankaracarya Bhagavatpada: An Introduction and Translation, Ashgate, ISBN 978-0-7546-3395-2, p.23
  68. ^ Nakamura 1950, pp. 262–265.
  69. ^ Per Durst-Andersen and Elsebeth F. Lange (2010), Mentality and Thought: North, South, East and West, CBS Press, ISBN 978-87-630-0231-8, p. 68
  70. ^ Ron Geaves (March 2002), From Totapuri to Maharaji: Reflections on a Lineage (Parampara), 27th Spalding Symposium on Indian Religions, Oxford
  71. ^ Klaus Klostermaier (2007), A Survey of Hinduism, Third Edition, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-7082-4, p. 40
  72. ^ Benedict Ashley, O.P. (2006). The Way toward Wisdom. p. 395. ISBN 0-268-02028-0. OCLC 609421317.
  73. ^ N. V. Isaeva (1992). Shankara and Indian Philosophy. State University of New York Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-7914-1281-7. OCLC 24953669.
  74. ^ a b c d Hacker 1995, p. 29–30.
  75. ^ King 2002, p. 128.
  76. ^ Roodurmum 2002, pp. 33–34.
  77. ^ Karl Potter (2008), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Advaita Vedānta up to Śaṃkara and his pupils, Vol. 3, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0310-7, pp. 346–347, 420–423, Quote: "There is little firm historical information about Suresvara; tradition holds Suresvara is same as Mandanamisra."
  78. ^ a b c Blake Michael 1992, p. 60–62 with notes 6, 7 and 8.
  79. ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Mādhava Āchārya". Encyclopædia Britannica.
  80. ^ a b Cynthia Talbot (2001), Precolonial India in Practice: Society, Region, and Identity in Medieval Andhra, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-513661-6, pp. 185–187, 199–201
  81. ^ a b c Roodurmum 2002, p. 30.
  82. ^ a b Roodurmum 2002, p. 29.
  83. ^ a b c Roodurmum 2002, p. 31.
  84. ^ Allen Wright Thrasher (1993). The Advaita Vedānta of Brahma-siddhi. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. vii–x. ISBN 978-81-208-0982-6.
  85. ^ a b Sharma 1997, p. 291.
  86. ^ Roodurmum 2002, p. 32.
  87. ^ a b c Roodurmum 2002, p. 35.
  88. ^ Allen Wright Thrasher (1993). The Advaita Vedānta of Brahma-siddhi. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 101–109, 51–75. ISBN 978-81-208-0982-6.
  89. ^ a b c d Sharma 1997, p. 290.
  90. ^ Sharma 1997, pp. 290–291.
  91. ^ Isaeva 1993, p. 241.
  92. ^ a b c d e Roodurmum 2002, p. 40.
  93. ^ a b Roodurmum 2002, p. 38.
  94. ^ Roodurmum 2002, p. 39.
  95. ^ a b Roodurmum 2002, p. 34.
  96. ^ Roodurmum 2002, p. 37.
  97. ^ Roodurmum 2002, p. 41.
  98. ^ a b Dasgupta 1955, p. 198.
  99. ^ Dasgupta 1955, pp. 198–199.
  100. ^ Dasgupta 1955, p. 199.
  101. ^ Madaio 2017, p. 4.
  102. ^ Madaio 2017, p. 5.
  103. ^ Nicholson 2010.
  104. ^ King 2002, pp. 136–138.
  105. ^ a b Nicholson 2010, pp. 190–194, 200–201.
  106. ^ a b Gaborieau, Marc (June 1985). "From Al-Beruni to Jinnah: Idiom, Ritual and Ideology of the Hindu-Muslim Confrontation in South Asia". Anthropology Today. 1 (3). Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland: 7–14. doi:10.2307/3033123. JSTOR 3033123.
  107. ^ a b Nicholson 2010, pp. 1–3.
  108. ^ Arvind Sharma (2002), On Hindu, Hindustān, Hinduism and Hindutva Numen, Vol. 49, Fasc. 1, pp. 5–9
  109. ^ Nicholson 2010, pp. 178–183.
  110. ^ King 2002, pp. 107–109.
  111. ^ King 2002, pp. 107–109, 128.
  112. ^ King 2002, pp. 132–133, 172.
  113. ^ Anshuman A Mondal (2004). Nationalism and Post-Colonial Identity: Culture and Ideology in India and Egypt. Routledge. pp. 85, 256. ISBN 978-1-134-49417-0.
  114. ^ Brian Morris (2006). Religion and Anthropology: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press. pp. 112, 141–144. ISBN 978-0-521-85241-8.
  115. ^ Thomas Blom Hansen (1999). The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton University Press. pp. 76–77, 91–92, 179–181, 44–47, 69–70. ISBN 978-0691006710.
  116. ^ King 2002, pp. 135–142.
  117. ^ Dense 1999, p. 191.
  118. ^ Rambachan 1994, pp. 91–92.
  119. ^ a b Rambachan 1994, p. 91.
  120. ^ Rabindra Kumar Dasgupta (1996). Swami Vivekananda on Indian philosophy and literature. Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture. pp. 145–146, 284–285. ISBN 978-81-85843-81-0.
  121. ^ Comans, Michael (1993). "The Question of the Importance of Samadhi in Modern and Classical Advaita Vedanta". Philosophy East and West. 43 (1). University of Hawai'i Press: 19–38. doi:10.2307/1399467. JSTOR 1399467. S2CID 170870115.
  122. ^ Rambachan 1984.
  123. ^ Rambachan 1991.
  124. ^ Rambachan 1994.
  125. ^ David Miller (1999). Karigoudar Ishwaran (ed.). Ascetic Culture: Renunciation and Worldly Engagement. BRILL Academic. pp. 115–117. ISBN 90-04-11412-2.
  126. ^ Michael Hawley (2005). Steven Engler and Gregory Price Grieve (ed.). Historicizing "Tradition" in the Study of Religion. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 300–312. ISBN 978-3-11-090140-5.
  127. ^ a b Robert Neil Minor (1987). Radhakrishnan: A Religious Biography. State University of New York Press. pp. 18, 25–26, 39–42, 132–134. ISBN 978-0-88706-554-5.
  128. ^ Gier, Nicholas F. (2012). "Overreaching to be different: A critique of Rajiv Malhotra's Being Different". International Journal of Hindu Studies. 16 (3): 259–285. doi:10.1007/s11407-012-9127-x. S2CID 144711827.
  129. ^ Donald Braue (1984), Maya in Radhakrishnan's Thought, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 0-8364-1129-3, pp. 101–136
  130. ^ a b c Nicholas F. Gier (2004). The Virtue of Nonviolence: From Gautama to Gandhi. State University of New York Press. pp. 40–42. ISBN 978-0-7914-5949-2.
  131. ^ J. Jordens (1998). Gandhi's Religion: A Homespun Shawl. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 116. ISBN 978-0-230-37389-1.
  132. ^ Jeffrey D. Long (2008). Rita Sherma and Arvind Sharma (ed.). Hermeneutics and Hindu Thought: Toward a Fusion of Horizons. Springer. p. 194. ISBN 978-1-4020-8192-7.
  133. ^ a b c Lucas 2011.
  134. ^ a b Marek 2008, p. 10 note 6.
  135. ^ a b Jacobs 2004, p. 82.
  136. ^ Swartz, James (10 July 2012). "What is Neo-Advaita?". advaita.org.uk.
  137. ^ a b Davis 2010, p. 48.
  138. ^ Yogani 2011, p. 805.
  139. ^ Caplan 2009, pp. 16–17.
  140. ^ Lucas 2011, pp. 102–105.
  141. ^ Gleig 2011, p. 10.
  142. ^ Katz 2007.

Sources

Printed sources

Web-sources
  1. ^ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Bhedābheda Vedānta
  2. ^ advaita-deanta.org, Advaita Vedanta before Sankaracarya
  3. ^ Asram Vidya Order, Biographical Notes About Sankara And Gaudapada
  4. ^ "Shri Kavale Math". Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 25 January 2013.
  5. ^ a b c d e f THE BHAMATI AND VIVARANA SCHOOLS
  6. ^ a b c Sangeetha Menon (2007), Advaita Vedānta, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  7. ^ s:The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda/Volume 2/Jnana-Yoga/The Absolute and Manifestation
  8. ^ a b c d e f Michael Hawley, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1888—1975), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  9. ^ a b c Advaita Vision, teachers
  10. ^ Timothy Conway, Neo-Advaita or Pseudo-Advaita and Real Advaita-Nonduality
  11. ^ What is Enlightenment? 1 September 2006
  12. ^ What is Enlightenment? 31 December 2001 Archived 10 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ^ What is Enlightenment? 1 December 2005
  14. ^ "Undivided Journal, About the Journal". Archived from the original on 23 August 2018. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
  15. ^ "Jerry Katz on Nonduality, "What is Nonduality?"". Archived from the original on 6 November 2018. Retrieved 30 January 2013.

Further reading

  • Nakamura, Hajime (1950a), A History of Early Vedanta Philosophy. Part One (1990 Reprint), Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
  • Nakamura, Hajime (1950), A History of Early Vedanta Philosophy. Part Two (2004 Reprint), Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
  • T. M. P. Mahadevan, Preceptors of Advaita, 1968
  • Potter, Karl H. (1981), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, vol. 3: Advaita Vedanta up to Sankara and his Pupils, Princeton: Princeton University Press
  • Potter, Karl H. (2006), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies vol. 11: Advaita Vedānta from 800 to 1200, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers
  • Isaeva, N.V. (1995), From Early Vedanta to Kashmir Shaivism: Gaudapada, Bhartrhari, and Abhinavagupta, SUNY Press

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Advaita_Vedanta&oldid=1063855517"