Jump to content

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 62/243: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
enlargement
→‎Legal status: enlargement
Line 25: Line 25:
==Legal status==
==Legal status==
Most experts<ref>e.g. Higgins (1994) p. 21</ref> consider most General Assembly resolutions to be non-binding. Articles 10 and 14 of the [[United Nations Charter|UN Charter]] refer to General Assembly resolutions as "recommendations"; the recommendatory nature of General Assembly resolutions has repeatedly been stressed by the [[International Court of Justice]].<ref>Sergei A. Voitovich, ''International Economic Organizations in the International Legal Process'', p. 95. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995. {{ISBN|0-7923-2766-7}}</ref>
Most experts<ref>e.g. Higgins (1994) p. 21</ref> consider most General Assembly resolutions to be non-binding. Articles 10 and 14 of the [[United Nations Charter|UN Charter]] refer to General Assembly resolutions as "recommendations"; the recommendatory nature of General Assembly resolutions has repeatedly been stressed by the [[International Court of Justice]].<ref>Sergei A. Voitovich, ''International Economic Organizations in the International Legal Process'', p. 95. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995. {{ISBN|0-7923-2766-7}}</ref>

While General Assembly resolutions are not binding on the members, they do reflect their opinion. In that respect, it was also important that the resolution reaffirmed, "[[List of states with limited recognition|no State shall recognize as lawful the situation resulting from the occupation]] of the territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan, nor render aid or assistance in maintaining this situation." Such language is a condemnation of any country actively supporting a movement that does not respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country.<ref>{{cite book |last1=J. Coyle |first1=James |last2= |first2= |date=2021 |title=Russia's Interventions in Ethnic Conflicts: The Case of Armenia and Azerbaijan |volume= |chapter=Diplomacy Surrounding Frozen Conflict |page=146 |quote= |url= |language=en |location=Switzerland |publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]] |isbn=978-3-030-59573-9 |archive-url= |archive-date= }}</ref> Furthermore, previous UN documents, unlike this resolution, did not contain explicit clauses on non-recognition of the occupying regime.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Czapliński |first1= Władysław |last2=Richter |first2= Dagmar|date=2019 |title=Unrecognised Subjects in International Law |volume= |chapter=Illegal States? |page=44 |quote= |url= |language=en |location= Warsaw|publisher=Scholar Publishing House Ltd. |isbn=978-83-7383-964-9 |archive-url= |archive-date= }}</ref>


== Draft resolution ==
== Draft resolution ==

Revision as of 14:36, 25 November 2022

UN General Assembly
Resolution 62/243
  
In favour
  
Against
  
Abstained
  
Absent
  
Non-voting
Date14 March 2008
Meeting no.86th Plenary
CodeA/RES/62/243 (Document)
SubjectThe situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan
Voting summary
  • 39 voted for
  • 7 voted against
  • 100 abstained
  • 46 absent
Resultadopted

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 62/243, titled "The Situation in the Occupied Territories of Azerbaijan", is a resolution of the United Nations General Assembly about the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh, which was adopted on March 14, 2008 at the 62nd session of the General Assembly. The document expresses serious concern that the armed conflict in and around the NagornoKarabakh region of the Republic of Azerbaijan continues to endanger international peace and security. It became the seventh United Nations document concerning Nagorno-Karabakh and the third and last United Nations General Assembly document on it.

The resolution refers to the previous UN documents regarding the conflict, recalling Security Council Resolutions 822 (1993), 853 (1993), 874 (1993) and 884 (1993), as well as General Assembly resolutions 48/114 of 20 December 1993, and 60/285 of 7 September 2006. Also, while adopting the resolution, the UN General Assembly took note of the report of the environmental assessment mission led by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe to the fire-affected territories in and around the Nagorno-Karabakh region[1] and the adverse implications of the conflict for the humanitarian situation and development of the countries of the South Caucasus.

The resolution reaffirmed "continued respect and support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity" of Azerbaijan "within its internationally recognized borders", demanded the "immediate, complete and unconditional withdrawal of all Armenian forces from all the occupied territories of Azerbaijan", and emphasized that "no state shall render aid or assistance" to maintain the occupation of Azerbaijani territories.[2] The resolution was adopted shortly after 2008 Agdere skirmishes, which at the time had been the heaviest ceasefire violation between Armenia and Azerbaijan since the end of Nagorno-Karabakh War.

Legal status

Most experts[3] consider most General Assembly resolutions to be non-binding. Articles 10 and 14 of the UN Charter refer to General Assembly resolutions as "recommendations"; the recommendatory nature of General Assembly resolutions has repeatedly been stressed by the International Court of Justice.[4]

While General Assembly resolutions are not binding on the members, they do reflect their opinion. In that respect, it was also important that the resolution reaffirmed, "no State shall recognize as lawful the situation resulting from the occupation of the territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan, nor render aid or assistance in maintaining this situation." Such language is a condemnation of any country actively supporting a movement that does not respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country.[5] Furthermore, previous UN documents, unlike this resolution, did not contain explicit clauses on non-recognition of the occupying regime.[6]

Draft resolution

In early 2005 the UN General Assembly's dispatch of a fact-finding mission had confirmed Armenian settlement in Azerbaijan's territory.[7] The Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to UN Agshin Mehdiyev presented the draft resolution A/62/L.42, which was adopted by a recorded vote of 39 in favour to 7 against (including OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs), with 100 abstentions.[8]

Voted for

Voted against

Voting rationales

  •  Indonesia. Indonesian representative said he had voted in favour because the document reaffirms principles and objectives in addressing the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.[7]
  • OSCE Minsk Group. Speaking on behalf of the group, the United States said that the Co-Chairs voted against because they "viewed resolution 62/243 as selectively propagating only certain of those principles to the exclusion of others, without considering the Co-Chairs’ proposal in its balanced entirety".
  •  South Africa. The South African delegation abstained from voting because South Africa supported the efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group to settle the conflict.[7]
  •  United Kingdom. According to Lord Howell of Guildford, his country abstained from voting "as the resolution did not take into account the Madrid Principles or Minsk Group process".[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ United Nations General Assembly (2008). "A/RES/62/243". undocs.org. United Nations. Archived from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 20 November 2022.
  2. ^ "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 14 March 2008 – The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan". United Nations. 14 March 2008. A/RES/62/243. Retrieved 18 March 2017.
  3. ^ e.g. Higgins (1994) p. 21
  4. ^ Sergei A. Voitovich, International Economic Organizations in the International Legal Process, p. 95. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995. ISBN 0-7923-2766-7
  5. ^ J. Coyle, James (2021). "Diplomacy Surrounding Frozen Conflict". Russia's Interventions in Ethnic Conflicts: The Case of Armenia and Azerbaijan. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 146. ISBN 978-3-030-59573-9.
  6. ^ Czapliński, Władysław; Richter, Dagmar (2019). "Illegal States?". Unrecognised Subjects in International Law. Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House Ltd. p. 44. ISBN 978-83-7383-964-9.
  7. ^ a b c "General Assembly adopts resolution reaffirming territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, demanding withdrawal of all Armenian forces". United Nations Department of Public Information. 2008-03-14. Archived from the original on 2009-01-21.
  8. ^ "The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan". General Assembly Sixty-second session - Official Records. United Nations. 2008-04-14. A/62/PV.86.
  9. ^ "House of Lords Written Answers 5 July 2010". UK parliament. Archived from the original on 2010-10-13. Retrieved 2010-12-08.