Formal act of defection from the Catholic Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A formal act of defection from the Catholic Church (Latin actus formalis defectionis ab Ecclesia catholica) was an externally provable juridic act of departure from the Catholic Church,[1] which was recognized from 1983 to 2009 in the Code of Canon Law as having certain juridical effects enumerated in canons 1086, 1117 and 1124. The concept of "formal" act of defection was narrower than that of "notorious" (publicly known) defection recognized in the 1917 Code of Canon Law[2][3] and still narrower than the concept of "de facto" defection. In 2006, the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts specified in what a formal act of defection from the Catholic Church consisted.[4] In 2009, all mention of a formal act of defection from the Catholic Church and of any juridical effects deriving from it was removed from the Code.[5]

Procedure from 2006 to 2009[edit]

Between 1983 and 2006, the Catholic Church in Germany and some other countries treated as a formal act of defection from the Catholic Church the declaration that some made to the civil authorities for the purpose of avoiding the extra tax traditionally collected by the state for the benefit of whatever Church the tax-payer was a member of. The Church in those countries considered people who made this declaration as no longer entitled to the privileges of membership of the Church, such as having a wedding in church.

The 2006 notification ruled that such declarations did not necessarily indicate a decision to abandon the Church in reality. It laid down that only the competent bishop or parish priest was to judge whether the person genuinely intended to leave the Church through an act of apostasy, heresy, or schism. It also pointed out that single acts of apostasy, heresy or schism (which can be repented) do not necessarily involve also a decision to leave the Church, and so "do not in themselves constitute a formal act of defection if they are not externally concretized and manifested to the ecclesiastical authority in the required manner."

The notification required therefore that the decision to leave the Church had to be manifested personally, consciously and freely, and in writing, to the competent Church authority, who was then to judge whether it was genuinely a case of "true separation from the constitutive elements of the life of the Church ... (by) an act of apostasy, heresy or schism."

If the bishop or parish priest decided that the individual had indeed made a formal act of defection from the Catholic Church – making a decision on this matter would normally require a meeting with the person involved – the fact of this formal act was to be noted in the register of the person's baptism. This annotation, like other annotations in the baptismal register, such as those of marriage or ordination, was unrelated to the fact of the baptism: it was not a "debaptism" (a term sometimes used journalistically): the fact of having been baptized remained a fact, and the Catholic Church holds that baptism marks a person with a seal or character that "is an ontological and permanent bond which is not lost by reason of any act or fact of defection".

Abolition[edit]

The motu proprio Omnium in mentem of 26 October 2009 removed from the canons in question all reference to an act of formal defection from the Catholic Church.[5][6][7] Accordingly, "it is no longer appropriate to enter attempts at formal defection in the sacramental records since this juridic action is now abolished. "[8]

In late August 2010, the Holy See confirmed that it was no longer possible to defect formally from the Catholic Church.[9] However, the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin declared on 12 October 2010 that it intended to keep a register of those who expressed the wish to defect.[9][10] Since this fell short of making an annotation in the baptismal register, CountMeOut (an association in the archdiocese that had been promoting formal defections from the Catholic Church) thereupon ceased to provide defection forms.[11][12]

Although the act of "formal defection" from the Catholic Church has thus been abolished, public or "notorious" (in the canonical sense)[13] defection from the Catholic faith or from the communion of the Church is of course possible, as is expressly recognized in the Code of Canon Law.[14] Even defection that is not known publicly is subject to the automatic spiritual penalty of excommunication laid down in canon 1364 of the Code of Canon Law.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law ed. John P. Beal, James A. Coriden, Thomas Joseph Green Canon Law Society of America 2000 "The formal act of defection from the Catholic Church is a juridic act which can be proven in the external forum and whose intended effect is to separate oneself from the Church"
  2. ^ Adolfo N. Dacanáy Canon law on marriage: introductory notes and comments 2000 Page 45 "The formal act of defection is to be interpreted strictly. It is a concept that is certainly more restricted than a notorious defection that C.1 7 1.1 talks about."
  3. ^ See canons 1240, 1065 and 2372 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law
  4. ^ Prot. N. 10279/2006 Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, Vatican City, 13 March 2006
  5. ^ a b Text in Latin of Omnium in mentem
  6. ^ Luke Coppen's Catholic Herald Blog Pope issues Motu Proprio modifying Canon Law
  7. ^ New papal decree clarifies role of deacons and result of defections on marriage
  8. ^ Diocese of Lafayette, "Proper Recording and Retention of Sacramental Records"
  9. ^ a b Statement on Formal Defections
  10. ^ Abolition of the process (access=2011-01-09)
  11. ^ Suspension of the Defection Process
  12. ^ Archdiocese of Dublin impeding formal defections from the Roman Catholic Church
  13. ^ In canon law, a forbidden action is notorious if "it is publicly known and was committed under such circumstances that no maneuver can conceal nor any legal defense excuse it" (T.L. Bouscaren and A.C. Ellis, Canon Law: A Text and Commentary, cited in John P. Beal, James A. Coriden, Thomas J. Green, New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law (Paulist Press 2002 ISBN 9780809140664), p. 1269
  14. ^ Code of Canon Law, canons 171 §1, 194 §1, 316 §1, 694 §1

External links[edit]

Official documents[edit]