Advanced stop line

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Brooklyn, with feeder lane between straight-ahead and turning motor lanes

An advanced stop line (ASL), also called advanced stop box or bike box, are road markings at signalised road junctions allowing certain types of vehicle a head start when the traffic signal changes from red to green. Advanced stop lines are implemented widely in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and other European countries.[1]

Description[edit]

Most commonly associated with bicycles, they may also be provided for buses and motorcycles. There are two parallel stop lines at the intersection, the first one at which all traffic except that for which the facility is provided must stop, and a second one nearer the intersection to which only specified vehicles may proceed. If the signals change to red when a vehicle is crossing the first line, the driver must stop at the second line [2] The area between the stop lines is the "reservoir" or "box". Signage may be required to inform road users as to the meaning of the extra stop line. A separate set of traffic signals may be provided for the specified traffic, but all vehicles usually use the same signals.

Cyclists[edit]

ASLs for cyclists are generally used in conjunction with some form of cycle lane for filtering cycle traffic. Traffic regulations in some countries (e.g. UK and Ireland) may require a cycle lane to give cyclists a legal way of bypassing the first stop line. This arrangement theoretically allows cyclists to play to their strengths by regularising the practice of filtering to the top of queuing traffic during the red phase at traffic lights. Cyclists turning to the offside (i.e. right in the UK and Ireland, left in USA etc.) are able to take up a proper turning position. Straight-on cyclists can adopt and maintain a prominent position for transiting the junction safely within the main traffic stream. An ASL will also help reduce the exposure of such cyclists at junctions with nearside (i.e. left in the UK and Ireland, right in USA etc.) filter lights by providing a place for cyclists to wait while traffic passes on the inside. A similar consideration arises where a free turn to the nearside is permitted (called right turn on red in the US).

At a red light, cyclists are more visible to motorists by being in front of them. At a green light, the green bike lane through the intersection reminds motorists and cyclists to watch for each other.

Safety aspects[edit]

Cyclists in a bike box in Toronto

Based on Danish research, it is argued that an ASL should have the general stop line 5 m back from the main traffic signal. The reasoning is that this puts cyclists clearly into the view of HGV (heavy goods vehicles) drivers, who have a blind spot up to 4 m directly in front of the cab. According to an OECD review, ASLs are also advocated as way of improving pedestrian safety at crossings by increasing the separation between crossing pedestrians and waiting motor vehicles.[3]

Although waiting cyclists might be safer out in front of HGVs, concerns have been expressed about nearside cycle lanes approaching such intersections may encourage cyclists to "creep up" on the inside of turning HGVs. Collisions with turning HGVs are strongly associated with a high risk of death and serious injury.[4] The 1997 edition of Cyclecraft by John Franklin advises cyclists that they should use such feeder lanes only if the traffic signal is red. If the signal is green, cyclists are advised that the best way to minimize danger may be to stay within the main traffic stream. If the lights change while the cyclist is still approaching, the advice is to negotiate their way back into the main traffic stream if possible. Advice produced by RoSPA regarding cyclists and lorries (large trucks) cautions cyclists that even though a junction has an ASL it may be better to hang back if there is a lorry (large truck) present.[4]

Portland, Oregon has implemented these "bike boxes" as they call them, to which bicyclists have claimed useful in aiding safety. The main goal is to prevent collisions between motorists turning right and cyclists going straight.[5] Research performed by the Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium showed that motorists and cyclists alike appear to understand and comply with the boxes. Nearly three quarters of motorists stopped behind the bike box and roughly the same percentage of cyclists stopped at the proper location ahead of the motor vehicle stop bar. In addition, the number of conflicts at the intersections decreased and drivers yielded more to cyclists after the boxes were installed. User perceptions of safety also improved.[1]

A leaflet produced by the UK Department for Transport notes:[6]

ASLs have been used successfully at sites with motor vehicle flows up to 1000 vehicles per hour, and with two-lane approaches. In Bristol they have been used on the approach to a signalised roundabout. Success will depend on cars not blocking the cycle lane or encroaching on the reservoir, and on signal timings which ensure that cyclists are not frequently stopped.

Implementations[edit]

Notable implementation of advanced stop lines include:

  • New York City: "over 100 bike boxes at intersections citywide," as of October 2008.[7]

External links[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Jennifer Dill (January 2011). "Evaluation of Bike Boxes at Signalized Intersections". Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium. Retrieved 2012-07-12. "Bike boxes and similar advanced stop lines are used extensively in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Denmark, and other European countries. Observations of yielding behavior at two bike box and one control intersection found an improvement in motorists yielding to cyclists at the bike box locations. Higher shares of surveyed motorists felt that the bike boxes made driving safer rather than more dangerous, even when the sample was narrowed to respondents who were not also cyclists. Over three-quarters of the surveyed cyclists thought that the boxes made the intersection safer." 
  2. ^ "Highway Code". 
  3. ^ "Scientific Expert Group on the Safety of Vulnerable Road Users (RS7), SAFETY OF VULNERABLE ROAD USERS". Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 7 Aug 1998. pp. 169–170. Retrieved 2012-07-12. "In the Swedish study mentioned earlier (Linderholm, 1992) ... analysis of the before-after situation showed that a recessed stop line for motor vehicles reduced the accident risk for cyclists crossing by about 35 per cent. ... In Denmark, the Danish Road Administration (1994d) carried out a study at four signalized junctions, where the stop line for motorists was recessed by five metres.... In the before period, between 12 and 24 per cent of the drivers turned right straight in front of a cyclist. In the after period, only 3 to 6 per cent did. On the basis of these results, safety of cyclists could be expected to improve. TRL in England (Wheeler, 1992) studied advanced stop lines (ASL) for cyclists at signalized junctions. ... The number of cyclists having a good position before turning right went from 57 per cent to 97 per cent." 
  4. ^ a b Cyclists and Lorries, Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, February 2006
  5. ^ Theenvironmentalblog.org
  6. ^ "Advanced stop lines for cyclists". UK Department for Transport. 
  7. ^ "NYCycles - The Official Newsletter of NYC DOT's Bike Program". New York City Department of Transportation. October 31, 2008. Retrieved 2012-07-12.