Category talk:Dracaena

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Tree of Life Category‑class

	This category is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Category redirect[edit]

There are only two categories with names beginning "Dracaena": Category:Dracaena (plant) and Category:Dracaena (lizard). The former has many times more entries than the latter. So it seems reasonable to me to have a soft category redirect from Category:Dracaena to Category:Dracaena (plant), since this is going to be the correct category in most cases.

This seems to me to be a generally applicable idea: when one disambiguated category is much more widely used than others, a category redirect will help editors. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter coxhead, as explained to you elsewhere, a redirect from an ambiguous title to just one meaning of that title leads to miscategorisation. I explained that to you[1] (with a ping) 13 minutes before your post here, and it's a great pity that yet again you have simply ignored my reply.

Since there are two extant categories to disambiguate (Category:Dracaena (plant) and Category:Dracaena (lizard)), I have made Category:Dracaena a category disambiguation page.[2]

I hope that will be an end to your disruptive drama-mongering. Sorry for the blunt language, but my attempts at subtlety have been futile, and I am losing patience with sustained efforts to act without learning. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's another approach (I didn't know there were such things as category disambiguation pages). As for "drama-mongering", I'll leave it to others to judge who is creating a drama out of what should be a sensible discussion. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter coxhead, we could have a sensible discussion if you a) backed off your persistent unilateral actions wrt to categories, even though you acknowledged earlier that you know little about them; b) read replies before launching off on more ill-considered actions. Both are very poor conduct, and are more consistent with a type of trolling than with genuine attempts at problem-solving. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]