Jump to content

Infected blood scandal in the United Kingdom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Graham Beards (talk | contribs) at 07:45, 30 October 2022 (→top: you can't contaminate anything with AIDS which is a medical syndrome). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Contaminated blood scandal
Bottle of factor VIII, a product used to treat haemophilia
Date1970s and 1980s
LocationUnited Kingdom
CauseContaminated factor VIII and factor IX
Deaths2,400+[1]
InquiriesContaminated Blood Scandal Inquiry

In the 1970s and 1980s, a large number of people – most of whom had haemophilia – were infected with hepatitis C and HIV, the virus that leads to acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), as a result of receiving contaminated clotting factor products. In the United Kingdom, these were supplied by the National Health Service (NHS). The Haemophilia Society estimates that around 4,700 people with bleeding disorders were infected,[2] with some estimates as high as 6,000.[1] As of August 2022, at least 2,400 people have died from the use of contaminated factor VIII and factor IX clotting agents and the viruses they transmitted.[1]

More broadly, contaminated blood transfusions and blood products provided by the NHS are thought to have infected around 25,000–30,000 people with viruses during the period.[2] People with haemophilia were principally infected via the plasma-derived product known as factor VIII, a processed pharmaceutical product sourced from the United States and elsewhere. The creation of such products involved dangerous manufacturing processes.[3] Large groups of paid donors were used (as many as 60,000 per batch, and including prisoners and drug addicts); it only required one infected donor to contaminate an entire batch, which would then infect all of the patients that received that material.[4] In contrast, this was at a time when the practice of paying donors for whole blood in the United States had effectively ceased; the UK did not import whole blood[5] from abroad, but it did import large quantities of Factor VIII given to those infected (as described in the documentary Factor 8: The Arkansas Prison Blood Scandal). The principal reason that the UK imported these products was that it did not produce enough of its own, and efforts to achieve self-sufficiency were inadequately funded.[6][7]

A study published in 1986 showed that 76% of those who used commercial clotting-factor products became infected with HIV, as opposed to none of those who only used the previous treatment cryoprecipitate.[8]

No government, healthcare or pharmaceutical entity in the UK has admitted any liability in the scandal. As part of an ongoing public inquiry, 3,000 surviving victims were awarded interim compensation payments in August 2022, to be paid urgently due to the extremely high death rate of survivors.[1]

Background

Haemophilia is a mostly inherited genetic disorder that impairs the body's ability to clot, a process needed to stop bleeding.[9][10] This results in people bleeding longer after an injury, easy bruising, and an increased risk of bleeding inside joints or other parts of the body.[citation needed]

There is no long-term cure for haemophilia. Treatment and prevention of bleeding episodes is done primarily by replacing the missing blood clotting factors using "synthetic" or "non-human derived" factor products such as recombinant factor VIII.[11] Factor products work by replacing the missing factor proteins, which can take place at home or in hospital. The clotting factors are made either from plasma or by recombinant methods. In the 1970s, haemophiliacs began to be treated with "Factor Concentrates", which were sold as a revolutionary treatment. The consequential increase in use led to pharmaceutical companies seeking substantial supplies of plasma, and thousands of donors including prisoners, drug addicts, prostitutes and people known to be infected with HIV or hepatitis were allowed or even paid to give their plasma.[citation needed]

Some of the most famous examples of risky plasma harvesting are those of Luckner Cambronne, who became known as "The Vampire of the Caribbean",[12] and also Crysosan Ltd, a company based in Canada that was found guilty of harvesting plasma from the bodies of dead Russians and re-labelling it as originating from Swedish donors.[13][14][15]

Products

Plasma donations could be collected using a process called plasmapheresis. In addition to NHS derived factors produced by Bio Products Laboratory (BPL), manufacturers that supplied clotting factor products to the UK during the mid-1970s and 1980s included Abbott (Profilate), Armour Pharmaceuticals (Factorate), Bayer-owned Cutter (Koate), Baxter International-owned Travenol/Hyland (Hemofil/Interhem), Immuno (Kryobulin) and Speywood (Humanate).[16][17]

  • BPL: In 2013 the British government sold an 80% stake in the company to Bain Capital for approximately £230 million.[18] In 2016 BPL was acquired by the Creat Group for £820m;[19] the government stood to receive £164m from its remaining 20% share in BPL.
  • Armour (Revlon): In 1978 Armour was purchased by Revlon for $90m[20] which owned the company until 1987 when it was sold to Rhône-Poulenc which purchased Revlon's drug operation for $690m in cash.[21] In 1996 Armour and Behringwerke were merged and became Centeon. In 1999 Centeon changed its name to Aventis Behring after the parent companies, Rorer and Hoechst AG merged to become Aventis. In 2004, CSL completed its acquisition of Aventis Behring for $925m, today known as CSL Behring.[22]
  • Bayer: Cutter Labs, which produced factor VIII, was originally owned by Miles Laboratories. In 1974 Cutter Labs was purchased by Bayer, and in 1978 Bayer also purchased Miles Labs. In 1995 Bayer dropped the Miles Labs brand name.[23] In 2005 a new company, Talecris[24] (set up by Cerberus Capital Management and Ampersand)[25] acquired Bayer's plasma business and assets for $590m. Bayer however, did not include its recombinant factor VIII "Kogenate"[26] in the sale and remains active in distribution internationally. In 2009, CSL Limited attempted to take over Talecris for $3.1 billion but was stopped by the Federal Trade Commission[27] which charged the deal would be illegal. In 2011, a year after announcing the $4bn deal, Grifols completed a takeover of Talecris.[28]
  • Hyland/Travenol (Baxter): Baxter created Travenol Labs in 1949 and acquired Hyland Labs in 1952.[29] In 1993 Baxter, was implicated in a lawsuit brought by haemophiliacs infected with HIV in the United States,[30] and, by the end of that year, president James Tobin had quit.[31] In 1996 Baxter settled a lawsuit brought by haemophiliacs in Japan.[32] In 2015, Baxter split-off its haemophilia sector to create Baxalta.[33] In 2016 Baxalta was acquired by Shire plc for $32bn.[34]
  • Immuno AG: Baxter purchased Immuno AG in 1996 in an effort to keep up with competitors for some $715m.[35][36]

1973–1986 – Hepatitis

The dangers of factor concentrates had been raised since their inception. In 1974, American scientist Judith Graham Pool (who previously discovered the frozen blood product cryoprecipitate, a safer treatment) described the products as "dangerous" and "unethical" and warned against their use. The World Health Organization also warned the UK not to import blood from countries with a high prevalence of hepatitis, such as the United States.[37]

In May 1975, the World Health Organization passed a widely circulated resolution urging all countries to aim at self-sufficiency in blood products.

In September 1975, an article was published detailing occurrences of a new kind of hepatitis.[38]

In December 1975, an episode of the World in Action programme highlighted the danger of hepatitis from imported clotting-factor products.[39]

By the end of 1978, more than 50% of the factor VIII used in England was being imported from overseas. This was because the country had failed to become self-sufficient in its own supplies.[40]

The BPL,[41] which manufactured UK blood products, ran into continual trouble from under-funding. The Archer Report said, "In July 1979, the Medicines Inspectorate visited BPL. They reported that the buildings were never designed for the scale of production envisaged. They commented: 'If this were a commercial operation we would have no hesitation in recommending that manufacture should cease until the facility was upgraded to a minimum acceptable level'. BPL was rescued by Crown Immunity. Among their recommendations the Inspectorate advised: 'Under no circumstances should production of any product be increased under the existing manufacturing conditions'. Meanwhile, the existing plant continued production, relying on Crown Immunity to dispense with all the requirements of the Medicines Act, but was able to meet only about 40% of the national requirements."

A study published in December 1983 showed conclusively that the risk to a haemophiliac of contracting hepatitis C by using untreated clotting-factor products was 100% upon first exposure.[42]

1981–1990 – HIV

In July 1982, the American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that at least 3 haemophiliacs there had developed Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, 2 had died, and all 3 had used untreated clotting-factor products.[43] The CDC said that "the occurrence among the three hemophiliac cases suggests the possible transmission of an agent through blood products".

In March 1983, the CDC reported that "Blood products or blood appear responsible for AIDS among hemophilia patients".[44]

In May 1983, Dr N. S. Galbraith, director of the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre in England and Wales, sent a paper entitled "Action on AIDS" to Dr Ian Field at the Department of Health and Social Security in London informing him of the death from AIDS of a haemophiliac who had received factor VIII concentrate imported from the United States. Galbraith stated: "I have reviewed the literature and come to the conclusion that all blood products made from blood donated in the USA after 1978 should be withdrawn from use until the risk of AIDS transmission by these products has been clarified ... I am most surprised that the USA manufacturers of the implicated blood products have not informed their customers of this new hazard. I assume no critical warning has been received in the United Kingdom?"[45] Despite Galbraith's warning, the products were not withdrawn; a Department of Health letter considered that his suggestion was "premature".[46]

In September 1983, a leaflet distributed to UK blood donors answered the question as to whether AIDS could be transmitted by blood-products to be "Almost certainly yes".[47]

In November 1983, the UK Health Minister, Kenneth Clarke, told Parliament that "There is no conclusive evidence that AIDS is transmitted by blood products", and the importation of infected products continued. When giving evidence to the Penrose Inquiry, Dr. Mark Winter said that, at the time Ken Clarke made this statement, "all haemophilia clinicians by this stage clearly believed that commercial blood products could and were transmitting AIDS".[48]

In January 1984, Lord Glenarthur (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the DHSS) said that "It remains the case that there is no conclusive evidence of the transmission of AIDS through blood products, although the circumstantial evidence is strong",[49] and, again, the use of untreated clotting-factor products and importation continued.

In April 1989, the HIV Haemophilia Litigation commenced which culminated in December 1990 with an out-of-court settlement.[50][51]

2000 – Destroyed-evidence investigation

In April 2000, the Department of Health published an internal audit to examine the loss of records relating to hepatitis C litigation.[52] The report concluded that "an arbitrary and unjustified decision, most likely taken by an inexperienced member of staff, was responsible for the destruction of a series of files containing the minutes and background papers of the Advisory Committee on the Virological Safety of Blood (ACVSB)".[53]

2009 – The Archer Report

In the early 2000s the former Solicitor General for England and Wales, Lord Peter Archer, campaigned for an inquiry into the tainted blood scandal alongside Lord Owen, who was the Health Minister from 1974 to 1976, Lord Jenkin, Health Secretary from 1979 to 1981, and others. They were unsuccessful.[citation needed]

In a 1990 episode of The Cook Report, Owen said: "I can see why some people would be unhappy with having all the facts revealed because it will show negligence".[54] In September 2016 Owen gave a speech in London during which he said the scandal had been covered up.[55]

The late Lord Archer of Sandwell chaired a privately funded independent investigation set up in 2007. The Archer Report was published in 2009 and aimed to uncover the causes of the events that led to the thousands of infections and deaths.[56] The report held no legal or official status and was unable to subpoena witnesses or demand the disclosure of documents.[37] Nonetheless, it sought to address the issue of missing evidence and documents relating to the scandal. For example, the ministerial papers of Lord Owen had been destroyed. "We have been unable to ascertain who carried out the destruction of the papers, and who gave the instructions. But the conclusion appears inescapable that some official made a decision which he or she had no authority to make, or that someone was guilty of a serious error of judgement. The consequence is that Lord Owen has done his best to recollect details of events a quarter of a century ago, but both he, and we, have been deprived of the primary sources", Lord Peter Archer reported. Lord Jenkin also voiced his difficulties obtaining documents for the inquiry, although the report stated: "He subsequently received from the Department two bundles of documents. One of these was to be treated as confidential". Lord Jenkin felt that the destruction of records was deliberate, and done "in order to draw a line under the disaster".[57]

Another handling error is described in the inquiry: "mishandling of documents arose in connection with a number of files relating to the Advisory Committee on the Virological Safety of Blood between May 1989 and February 1992 which were found to be missing". The report went on to state: "They were in fact destroyed over a period from July 1994 to March 1998". When summarising these events it is stated "some of those who gave evidence to us suspected that there was an exercise in suppressing evidence of negligence or misconduct."

2015 – Scottish Penrose Inquiry

Main article: Penrose Inquiry

In 2008 the Scottish government announced a public inquiry into the scandal covering Scotland only, to be chaired by Lord Penrose.[58] The inquiry's terms of reference outlined five deaths that were to be examined,[59] but only one of those victims was a haemophiliac[60][61] and that person had been infected with hepatitis C in the 1960s as part of their treatment for haemophilia.[62]

Published in 2015, the inquiry was described as a whitewash[63][64] and waste of public money (over £12 million)[65] by critics after it found that very little could have been done differently,[66] and failed to apportion any blame in the scandal whilst making just one recommendation.[67] Its recommendation was to offer blood tests to anyone in Scotland who had a blood transfusion before 1991 and who had not already been tested for hepatitis C.[68]

In July 2017 a group legal action Jason Evans & Ors was brought against the government on behalf of more than 500 people.[69][70] After years of increasing pressure from campaigners and MPs, Prime Minister Theresa May announced a full UK-wide public inquiry into the scandal.[71][72] In September 2017 a court ruling found in favour of the victims allowing them to launch a High Court action to seek damages.[73][74][75]

2018 – False ministerial statements withdrawn

In June 2018 the Department of Health issued an apology, because for two years Ministers had told Parliament that in relation to Contaminated Blood Scandal evidence: "All documents up to 1995 are available through the National Archives".[76]

2019 – Files still missing

In February 2019, it emerged that around 450 files had been taken from the archives by staff from the Department of Health and Social Care, and not returned, sparking concerns among campaigners that the department was attempting a cover-up.[77]

Government support

Successive governments, both Labour and Conservative, have been criticised for their handling of the case, limited support schemes and refusal to conduct a public inquiry (until 2017). Some limited support has been provided to selected individuals through charitable trusts[78] which is often subject to means testing, though no damages or compensation have ever been paid to UK victims or their families.[79][80]

In 1991 the Conservative government made £42 million available to those affected by HIV,[81] this equates to around £29,000 on average between the 1,437 people who received a payment.

In 2017 the Conservatives announced more funds for those with first-stage chronic hepatitis C, but this additional money was reportedly to be sourced from funds for other tainted blood victims. The Department of Health was accused of robbing one set of victims to pay another. Officials stated that it had made available an extra £125 million, more than any previous government, but critics said this money was simply accounted for as a cost to the NHS of extending treatments to those with hepatitis C sooner.[82]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Weaver, Matthew (16 August 2022). "Survivors of contaminated blood scandal awarded interim payments". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
  2. ^ a b Burki, Talha (August 2022). "Compensation advised for UK victims of contaminated blood scandal". The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 7 (8): 706. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00204-7.
  3. ^ "Bad Blood: A Cautionary Tale". Kpbs.org. 4 August 2011.
  4. ^ "Hemophilia Federation (India) – Product Safety". Hemophilia.in.
  5. ^ Glenarthur, Simon. "Blood: Licensing Requirements". Hansard. House of Lords.
  6. ^ Meikle, James (19 August 2002). "Owen demands inquiry into infected blood scandal". The Guardian.
  7. ^ "HIV blood disaster papers 'were pulped'". The Telegraph. 11 July 2007.
  8. ^ Gill, Joan C.; Menitove, Jay E.; Anderson, Philip R.; Casper, James T.; Devare, Sushilkumar G.; Wood, Charles; Adair, Stuart; Casey, James; Scheffel, Christi; Montgomery, Robert R. (April 1986). "HTLV-III serology in hemophilia: Relationship with immunologic abnormalities". The Journal of Pediatrics. 108 (4): 511–516. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80824-1. PMID 3083075. S2CID 29262000.
  9. ^ "What Is Hemophilia?". NHLBI. 13 July 2013. Retrieved 8 September 2016.
  10. ^ "Hemophilia Facts". CDC. 26 August 2014. Retrieved 8 September 2016.
  11. ^ Franchini, M. (October 2010). "Plasma-derived versus recombinant Factor VIII concentrates for the treatment of haemophilia A: recombinant is better". Blood Transfusion. 8 (4): 292–296. doi:10.2450/2010.0067-10. PMC 2957496. PMID 20967172.
  12. ^ Pepin, Jacques (2011). The Origins of AIDS. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139501415.
  13. ^ Ridgeway, James (2004). It's All for Sale: The Control of Global Resources. Duke University Press. p. 184. ISBN 978-0822333746. cryosan russian.
  14. ^ "Blood money". Salon.com. 24 December 1998.
  15. ^ Dobbin, Murray (2003). Paul Martin: CEO for Canada?. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company. p. 31. ISBN 9781550287998.
  16. ^ "Quantities of FVIII Concentrate Used in UK Haemophiliacs: Breakdown by Manufacturer" (PDF). TaintedBlood.info. Department of Health Freedom of Information release DH_Vol_29_May_1983_Jun_1983. Retrieved 3 April 2020.
  17. ^ Speywood Laboratories Ltd, Clinical Trial Certificate. Committee on Safety of Medicines: Sub-Committee on Biological Products, Series: BN, Box: 244, File: 116. Kew, London: The National Archives (TNA).
  18. ^ "'Is there no limit to what this Government will privatise?': UK plasma". Independent.co.uk. 18 July 2013.
  19. ^ "PRESS RELEASE: Creat Group Corporation agrees to acquire Bio Products Laboratory Ltd. - Bio Products Laboratory Ltd". Bpl.co.uk. Archived from the original on 9 January 2017. Retrieved 8 January 2017.
  20. ^ "Revlon Set to Buy Armour Druz Units". The New York Times.
  21. ^ Crudele, John (30 November 1985). "RORER BUYS DRUG UNIT OF REVLON". The New York Times.
  22. ^ "Saving Lives For More Than A Century – CSL Behring". Cslbehring.com.
  23. ^ "1988-2001 – A Journey through the History of Bayer". Bayer.com.
  24. ^ "Announcing the Launch of Talecris Biotherapeutics: Combining a Proud History of Patient Care with a Bold New Vision". Business Wire. April 2005.
  25. ^ "Ampersand". Ampersandcapital.com.
  26. ^ "Kogenate® FS, Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)". Kogenatefs.com.
  27. ^ "FTC Authorizes Suit To Stop CSLs Proposed $3.1 Billion Acquisition of Talecris Biotherapeutics – Federal Trade Commission". Ftc.gov. 27 May 2009.
  28. ^ "Grifols Worldwide :: Acquisition of Talecris". Grifols.com.
  29. ^ "History of Baxter International Inc". FundingUniverse.com.
  30. ^ "AIDS Suit Accuses Companies of Selling Bad Blood Products". The New York Times. 4 October 1993.
  31. ^ "TOBIN RESIGNS FROM BAXTER – Pharmaceutical industry news". Thepharmaletter.com.
  32. ^ FARLEY, MAGGIE (4 March 1996). "Baxter Is in Talks to Settle Tainted-Blood Suit in Japan". Los Angeles Times.
  33. ^ "Baxalta Spins Off from Baxter". Genengnews.com. July 2015.
  34. ^ "Shire, Baxalta Complete $32B Merger". Genengnews.com. 3 June 2016.
  35. ^ Lipin, Steven; Journal, Thomas M. Burton Staff Reporters of The Wall Street (29 August 1996). "Baxter Will Acquire Immuno In Deal Valued at $715 Million". The Wall Street Journal.
  36. ^ Freudenheim, Milt (30 August 1996). "Baxter Purchasing Immuno, Swiss Blood-Products Maker". The New York Times.
  37. ^ a b "Justice delayed". Private Eye. London: Pressdram Ltd. 28 July 2017.
  38. ^ Mosley, James W. (September 1975). "Hepatitis Types B and Non-B, Epidemiologic Background". JAMA. 233 (9): 967–969. doi:10.1001/jama.1975.03260090033016. PMID 168417.
  39. ^ "World in Action - "Blood Money"" (PDF). Penroseinquiry.org.uk.
  40. ^ Jones, P (21 June 1980). "Factor VIII supply and demand". British Medical Journal. 280 (6230): 1531–1532. doi:10.1136/bmj.280.6230.1531. PMC 1601689. PMID 6770954.
  41. ^ "About BPL – Bio Products Laboratory Ltd". Bpl.co.uk. Archived from the original on 29 October 2015. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  42. ^ Fletcher, M. L.; Trowell, J. M.; Craske, J.; Pavier, K.; Rizza, C. R. (10 December 1983). "Non-A non-B hepatitis after transfusion of factor VIII in infrequently treated patients". British Medical Journal. 287 (6407): 1754–1757. doi:10.1136/bmj.287.6407.1754. PMC 1549875. PMID 6416577.
  43. ^ "1982- AIDS is Discovered Among Hemophilia Patients". Hemophilia Federation of America. 17 March 2014.
  44. ^ "1983—CDC Determines that AIDS is Spread Through Infected Blood". Hemophilia Federation of America. 17 March 2014.
  45. ^ "Preliminary Report Chapter 8: HIV and AIDS". Penroseinquiry.org.uk.
  46. ^ "Preliminary Report Chapter 8: HIV and AIDS". Penroseinquiry.org.uk.
  47. ^ "Brochure: Aids and how it concerns blood donors" (PDF). Penroseinquiry.org.uk.
  48. ^ "Final Report: Chapter 9 – Knowledge of the Geographical Spread and Prevalence of HIV/AIDS 1". Penroseinquiry.org.uk.
  49. ^ "Letter to Government" (PDF). Penroseinquiry.org.uk. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
  50. ^ "Part IV: International Responses to the Risk of HIV in the Blood Supply" (PDF). Krever Report. p. 941. ...in April 1989 a number of hemophiliacs brought a civil action against the Department of Health, the Medicines Licensing Authority, the Committee on Safety of Medicines, the Blood Products Laboratory, and the regional health authorities.
  51. ^ Gavin Strang (20 December 1991). "Infected Blood Transfusions". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Commons. col. 620–621. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
  52. ^ Flint, Caroline. "Destroyed Documents (Blood Products)". Hansard. House of Commons.
  53. ^ "Internal Audit Review – Hepatitis C Litigation - Final Report" (PDF). Squarespace.com. April 2000. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
  54. ^ "The Cook Report – Profits Before Patients". YouTube. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021.
  55. ^ "Lord David Owen – Bad Blood Speech 29/9/16". YouTube. 30 September 2016. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021.
  56. ^ Sam Marsden (23 February 2009). "Delays led to thousands receiving contaminated blood". The Independent. Retrieved 14 February 2010.
  57. ^ The Archer Inquiry. 2009. Archived from the original on 3 July 2012. Retrieved 1 April 2018. On 13 April 2005 Lord Jenkin met Sir Nigel, who apologised for the original reply. Lord Jenkin was left with the clear impression from their subsequent conversation that all the files bearing upon the issue of contaminated blood products had been destroyed, and that this had been done 'with intent, in order to draw a line under the disaster'.
  58. ^ Dinwoodie, Robbie (9 May 2009). "Blood inquiry cost has reached £9m". The Herald Scotland. Retrieved 29 January 2022. The inquiry into blood contamination affecting hundreds of patients in the 1970s and 1980s was called by Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon in April 2008... ...It was chaired by senior judge Lord Penrose...
  59. ^ "Terms of Reference". penroseinquiry.org.uk. Penrose Inquiry. Retrieved 29 January 2022. To investigate the deaths of Reverend David Black, Mrs Eileen O'Hara, Alexander Black Laing and Victor Tamburrini, with particular reference to the circumstances in which they became infected with the Hepatitis C virus, HIV or both.
  60. ^ "Final Report". penroseinquiry.org.uk. Retrieved 29 January 2022. 7.12 Mr Black was born on 1 May 1937. He died on 31 October 2003 at Strathcarron Hospice, Stirlingshire. The cause of death was registered as hepatocellular cancer in a transplanted liver, Hepatitis C, transfusion of blood products and haemophilia...
  61. ^ "Extract of an entry in a register of deaths" (PDF). 1 February 2010. BLA0012118. Retrieved 29 January 2022.
  62. ^ "Penrose Report". penroseinquiry.org.uk. Penrose Inquiry. Retrieved 29 January 2022. On the balance of probabilities Mr Black acquired Hepatitis C infection before the end of the 1960s in the course of haemophilia therapy in Scotland.
  63. ^ Cooper, Charlie (25 March 2015). "Penrose report: Blood scandal inquiry branded a 'whitewash'". The Independent. Retrieved 29 January 2022.
  64. ^ "Victims cry 'whitewash' over Penrose blood infection inquiry". bbc.co.uk. BBC News Scotland. Retrieved 29 January 2022. Victims and relatives of the contaminated blood scandal cry out "whitewash" at the end of the news conference publicising the findings of a judge-led inquiry.
  65. ^ Puttick, Helen (26 March 2015). "Penrose Inquiry: £12m contaminated blood probe branded a whitewash". The Herald Scotland. Retrieved 29 January 2022.
  66. ^ "Penrose Inquiry: report on NHS patients given contaminated blood due". ITV News. Retrieved 29 January 2022. And though it found patients weren't adequately informed of the risks, it says few things could have been done differently.
  67. ^ Glackin, Michael (26 March 2015). "Penrose inquiry: 'Nothing could have prevented tragedy'". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 29 January 2022. Despite this, and amid much criticism from victims at Lord Penrose's failure to apportion blame,...
  68. ^ Peterki, Tom (25 March 2015). "Blood scandal victims condemn Penrose inquiry". The Scotsman. Retrieved 29 January 2022. The Scottish Government accepted Lord Penrose's solitary recommendation to test patients who had a blood transfusion before September 1991 for hepatitis C if they have not already been examined.
  69. ^ "Momentum in Contaminated Blood Scandal grows as Collins apply for a Group Litigation Order" (Press release). Collins Solicitors. 4 July 2017.
  70. ^ "ITV News – Families seek justice in Blood Scandal – 4th July 2017". YouTube. 4 July 2017. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021.
  71. ^ Walker, Peter; Topping, Alexandra (11 July 2017). "Theresa May orders contaminated blood scandal inquiry". The Guardian.
  72. ^ "Blood probe 'lessons must be learned'". BBC News. 14 July 2017. Retrieved 4 December 2017.
  73. ^ "Victims win contaminated blood ruling". BBC News. 26 September 2017. Retrieved 26 September 2017.
  74. ^ "Victims and families can bring High Court action on contaminated blood products". Evening Express. 26 September 2017. Archived from the original on 26 September 2017. Retrieved 26 September 2017.
  75. ^ "Victims and families win High Court ruling to seek damages over contaminated blood products". ITV News. Retrieved 26 September 2017.
  76. ^ "Blood: Contamination:Written question – 65851". UK Parliament.
  77. ^ "Cover-up fears as hundreds of contaminated blood files 'vanish' before inquiry can see them". The Independent. 11 February 2019. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
  78. ^ "The Macfarlane Trust". Macfarlane.org.uk. Archived from the original on 4 March 2012.
  79. ^ Harpin, Lee (22 July 2017). "Victims of contaminated blood scandal weren't given Tory compensation". mirror.
  80. ^ "In the urgent question on 16...: 21 Jan 2016: House of Commons debates - TheyWorkForYou". TheyWorkForYou.
  81. ^ "Blood: Contamination: Written question – 211081". UK Parliament. Retrieved 4 December 2017.
  82. ^ "What a Hunt". Private Eye. London: Pressdram Ltd. 24 March 2017.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Infected_blood_scandal_in_the_United_Kingdom&oldid=1119015697"