|Napier Nomad II|
|National origin||United Kingdom|
|Manufacturer||Napier & Son|
|First run||October 1949|
|Major applications||Avro Lincoln (test bed only)
Avro Shackleton (planned only)
Britannia Maritime Reconnaissance (planned only)
Airspeed Ambassador (BEA) (planned only)
|Program cost||£5.1 million|
The Napier Nomad was a British diesel aircraft engine designed and built by Napier & Son in 1949. They combined a piston engine with a turbine to recover energy from the exhaust and thereby improve fuel economy. Two versions were tested, the complex Nomad I which used two propellers, each driven by the mechanically independent stages, and the Nomad II, using the turbo-compound principle, coupled the two parts to drive a single propeller. The Nomad II had the lowest specific fuel consumption figures seen up to that time. Despite this the Nomad project was cancelled in 1955 having spent £5.1 million on development, as most interest had passed to turboprop designs.
In the early years of jet development, during WWII, it became clear that the jet's fuel efficiency was well below that of the reciprocating engine. The low continuous temperature tolerated by the combustion chambers, under 1200°K, was to blame. Piston engines tolerate a peak combustion temperature of some 4800°K, because this high temperature is sustained only for one or two milliseconds. The thermodynamic efficiency of an ideal engine is given simply by 100(1-Te/Tp) in percent, where Te is the exhaust temperature in Kelvin, and Tp is the peak combustion temperature. Thus, a jet could easily triple its fuel efficiency by using a diesel engine to inject the kerosene fuel and combust the fuel/air mixture. The best gasoline fuel (130 avgas) at the time was unsuitable as it tolerated a maximum compression ratio of about 10:1, whereas ordinary diesel engines could attain 18:1, and 22:1 with Ricardo indirect combustion chambers.
The Nomad compound engine achieved a specific fuel consumption of 0.345 lbs per horsepower-hour. In contrast, a very efficient Pratt & Whitney R-1830 petrol radial engine consumes 0.49 lb/hp.h at cruise settings. However, in practice the jet engine is still preferable since it is much smaller and lighter, and operates at much higher altitudes and speeds. The jet thus consumes about the same amount of fuel for a given trip distance, due to its much shorter transit time at higher altitudes.
Design and development
In 1945 the Air Ministry asked for proposals for a new 6,000 horsepower (4,500 kW) class engine with good fuel economy. Curtiss-Wright was designing an engine of this sort of power known as the turbo-compound engine, but Sir Harry Ricardo, one of Britain's great engine designers, suggested that the most economical combination would be a similar design using a diesel two-stroke in place of the Curtiss's petrol engine.
Before World War II Napier had licensed the Junkers Jumo 204 diesel design to set up production in the UK as the Napier Culverin, but the onset of the war made the Sabre all-important and work on the Culverin was stopped. In response to the Air Ministry's 1945 requirements Napier dusted off this work, combining two enlarged Culverins into an H-block similar to the Sabre, resulting in a massive 75 litre design. Markets for an engine of this size seemed limited, however, so instead they reverted to the original Sabre-like horizontally opposed 12 cylinder design, and the result was the Nomad.
The objective of the design was to produce a civilian power plant with far superior fuel efficiency to the emerging jet engine. Thermal efficiency is given by 1-(Tx/Tp), where Tx is the exhaust temperature (any absolute scale) and Tp is the peak combustion temperature. Jet engines have relatively low-temperature combustion systems which produce a Tp of no more than about 1000 kelvin, much less than the typical 5000 kelvin of a reciprocating engine, and so jets have very poor thermal efficiency. The Nomad design focused on replacing the low temperature combustion chambers of the jet engine with highly efficient Diesel combustion chambers. In practice, it was much too difficult to couple the Diesel power output back into the turbine cycle. The maximum practical power of the Nomad was 4,000 horsepower (3,000 kW), and it was much heavier than a pure jet of the same power. By this time civilian jets such as the Boeing 707 were nearing completion, and the Nomad was never seriously considered by any aircraft manufacturer.
The initial Nomad design (E.125) or Nomad 3 was incredibly complex, almost two engines in one. One was a turbo-supercharged two-stroke diesel, having some resemblance to half of a Napier Sabre. Mounted below this were the rotating parts of a turboprop engine, based on the Naiad design, the output of which drove the front propeller of a contra-rotating pair. To achieve higher boost, the crankshaft drove a centrifugal supercharger, which also provided the scavenging needed for starting the engine from rest. During take-off additional fuel was injected into the rear turbine stage for more power, and turned off once the aircraft was cruising.
The compressor and turbine assemblies of the Nomad were tested during 1948, and the complete unit was run in October 1949. The prototype was installed in the nose of an Avro Lincoln heavy bomber for testing: it first flew in 1950 and appeared at the Farnborough Air Display on 10 September 1951. In total the Nomad I ran for just over 1,000 hours, and proved to be rather temperamental, but when running properly it could produce 3,000 horsepower (2,200 kW) and 320 lbf (1.4 kN) thrust. It had a specific fuel consumption (sfc) of 0.36 lb/(hp·h) (0.22 kg/(kW·h)).
Even before the Nomad I was running, its successor, the Nomad II (E.145) Nomad 6, had already been designed. In this version an extra stage was added to the axial compressor/supercharger, eliminating the separate centrifugal part and the intercooler. The turbine (which also received an additional stage) was now only used to drive the compressor, and feed back any excess power to the main shaft using a hydraulic clutch; the separate propeller from the turbine was deleted, just as the whole of the "afterburner" system with its valves etc. So the system was now like a combination of a mechanical supercharger, and a turbocharger without any need for bypass. The result was smaller and considerably simpler: a single engine driving a single propeller. Overall about 1,000 lb (450 kg) was taken off the weight. The wet liners of the cylinders of the Nomad I were changed for dry liners. While the Nomad II was undergoing testing, a prototype Avro Shackleton was lent to Napier as a testbed. The engine proved bulky, like the Nomad I before it, and in the meantime several dummy engines were used on the Shackleton for various tests.
A further development, the Nomad Nm.7, of 3,500 shp (2,600 kW) was announced in 1953.
By 1954 interest in the Nomad was waning, and after the only project, the Avro Type 719 Shackleton IV, based on it was cancelled, work on the engine was ended in April 1955, after an expenditure of £5.1 million.
Specifications (Nomad II)
Data from Flight 1954
- Type: Twelve-cylinder, two-stroke valveless diesel engine compounded with three-stage turbine driving both crankshaft and axial compressor.
- Bore: 6.00 inches (152 mm)
- Stroke: 7.375 inches (187.3 mm)
- Displacement: 2,502 in³ (41.1 L)
- Length: 119 inches (3,000 mm)
- Width: 56.25 inches (1,429 mm)
- Height: 40 inches (1,000 mm)
- Dry weight: 3,580 pounds (1,620 kg)
- Valvetrain: Piston ported two-stroke
- Supercharger: Napier Naiad turboshaft and gas generator, maximum boost pressure 89 psi
- Turbocharger: Engine exhaust gases ducted in to Naiad turbine section
- Fuel type: Diesel oil or kerosene or wide-cut petrol or "other fuels"
- Cooling system: Liquid-cooled
- Power output: 3,150 ehp (2,344 kW) max take-off at 89 psi (610 kPa)(208"Hg)(6.9Atm) boost including 320 lbf residual thrust from the turbine at 2,050 rpm (crankshaft) and 18,200 rpm (turbine)
- Specific power: 1.25 ehp/in³ (57.0 kW/L)
- Compression ratio: 8.1 (cylinder ratio), 31.5:1 (combined pressure ratio)
- Specific fuel consumption: 0.345 lb/(ehp·h) (0.210 kg/(kW·h))(combined unit) at 11,000 ft and 300 knots
- Power-to-weight ratio: 0.88 ehp/lb (1.44 kW/kg)
- Maximum thrust: 320 lbf residual at 18,200 rpm
- Overall pressure ratio: 8.25:1
- Power-to-weight ratio:
- Comparable engines
- Related lists
- Gunston, Bill (1989). World Encyclopaedia of Aero Engines. Cambridge, England: Patrick Stephens. p. 106. ISBN 1-85260-163-9.
- "Cancelled projects: the list up-dated" (PDF). Flight: 262. 17 August 1967.
- Lumsden 2003 p170
- Lumsden 2003 p172
- Lumsden 2003 p171
- Flight 1954 p550
- Flight Nov 1953 p 610
- Gunston, Bill (30 April 1954). "Napier Nomad: An engine of outstanding efficiency" (PDF). Flight: 543–551. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
- Lumsden, Alec (2003). British Piston Engines and their Aircraft. Marlborough, Wiltshire: Airlife Publishing. p. 170. ISBN 1-85310-294-6.
- http://avroshackleton.com/nomad.html – The Nomad Proposal, research by Chris Ashworth – it was amongst the original sources of the article according to the history, only under the now dead link of http://www.home.aone.net.au/shack_one/nomad.htm,
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Napier Nomad.|
- Photo gallery of Napier engines at Enginehistory.org
- "Napier Nomad" a 1952 Flight advertisement for the Nomad engine
- "Nomad NNm6" a 1953 Flight article on the Nomad II
- A Napier Nomad 2 mounted in the outboard nacelle of a Shackleton in a 1961 issue of Flight